These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33493941)

  • 1. Safety analysis of freeway on-ramp merging with the presence of autonomous vehicles.
    Zhu J; Tasic I
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():105966. PubMed ID: 33493941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co-simulation platform.
    Chen P; Ni H; Wang L; Yu G; Sun J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 May; 199():107530. PubMed ID: 38437756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety evaluation of freeway interchange merging areas based on driver workload theory.
    Hu J; He L; Wang R
    Sci Prog; 2020; 103(3):36850420940878. PubMed ID: 32660349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How would autonomous vehicles behave in real-world crash scenarios?
    Zhou R; Zhang G; Huang H; Wei Z; Zhou H; Jin J; Chang F; Chen J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107572. PubMed ID: 38657314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Network-wide safety impacts of dedicated lanes for connected and autonomous vehicles.
    Sha H; Singh MK; Haouari R; Papazikou E; Quddus M; Quigley C; Chaudhry A; Thomas P; Weijermars W; Morris A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107424. PubMed ID: 38091887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utilizing UAV video data for in-depth analysis of drivers' crash risk at interchange merging areas.
    Gu X; Abdel-Aty M; Xiang Q; Cai Q; Yuan J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():159-169. PubMed ID: 30513457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crash Risk Prediction Modeling Based on the Traffic Conflict Technique and a Microscopic Simulation for Freeway Interchange Merging Areas.
    Li S; Xiang Q; Ma Y; Gu X; Li H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 27869763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying effects of ramp metering on freeway safety.
    Lee C; Hellinga B; Ozbay K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 16329982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles.
    Mahdinia I; Mohammadnazar A; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106006. PubMed ID: 33556655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Types and characteristics of ramp-related motor vehicle crashes on urban interstate roadways in Northern Virginia.
    McCartt AT; Northrup VS; Retting RA
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 14992851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the safety impacts of the number and arrangement of lanes on freeway exit ramps.
    Chen H; Liu P; Lu JJ; Behzadi B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 May; 41(3):543-51. PubMed ID: 19393805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the impact of HMI on drivers' merging performance in intelligent connected vehicle environment.
    Wang Y; Lyu N; Wu C; Du Z; Deng M; Wu H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Apr; 198():107448. PubMed ID: 38340472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety performance evaluation of left-side off-ramps at freeway diverge areas.
    Chen H; Zhou H; Zhao J; Hsu P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):605-12. PubMed ID: 21376845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interactive risk analysis on crash injury severity at a mountainous freeway with tunnel groups in China.
    Huang H; Peng Y; Wang J; Luo Q; Li X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():56-62. PubMed ID: 29172045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comprehensive safety assessment in mixed fleets with connected and automated vehicles: A crash severity and rate evaluation of conventional vehicles.
    Sinha A; Chand S; Wijayaratna KP; Virdi N; Dixit V
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105567. PubMed ID: 32361477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cooperative control method for safer on-ramp merging process in heterogeneous traffic flow.
    Yang W; Dong C; Chen X; Chen Y; Wang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Dec; 193():107324. PubMed ID: 37776576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What humanlike errors do autonomous vehicles need to avoid to maximize safety?
    Mueller AS; Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    J Safety Res; 2020 Dec; 75():310-318. PubMed ID: 33334489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is vehicle automation enough to prevent crashes? Role of traffic operations in automated driving environments for traffic safety.
    Jeong E; Oh C; Lee S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():115-124. PubMed ID: 28499140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agricultural vehicles and rural road safety: tackling a persistent problem.
    Jaarsma CF; De Vries JR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 24279972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human-like car-following model for autonomous vehicles considering the cut-in behavior of other vehicles in mixed traffic.
    Fu R; Li Z; Sun Q; Wang C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105260. PubMed ID: 31442924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.