328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33494616)
21. [Atherosclerotic risk factors in development of bioprosthetic valve failure].
Rutkovskaia NV; Savoct'ianova IuIu; Barbarash OL
Kardiologiia; 2014; 54(6):76-80. PubMed ID: 25178083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Simulation of long-term fatigue damage in bioprosthetic heart valves: effects of leaflet and stent elastic properties.
Martin C; Sun W
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2014 Aug; 13(4):759-70. PubMed ID: 24092257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reducing immunoreactivity of porcine bioprosthetic heart valves by genetically-deleting three major glycan antigens, GGTA1/β4GalNT2/CMAH.
Zhang R; Wang Y; Chen L; Wang R; Li C; Li X; Fang B; Ren X; Ruan M; Liu J; Xiong Q; Zhang L; Jin Y; Zhang M; Liu X; Li L; Chen Q; Pan D; Li R; Cooper DKC; Yang H; Dai Y
Acta Biomater; 2018 May; 72():196-205. PubMed ID: 29631050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve implantation increases risk of reoperation for structural valve deterioration.
Urso S; Calderón P; Sadaba R; Mahillo I; Tuñón J; Aldamiz G; Fraile J
J Card Surg; 2014 Jul; 29(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 24773571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hemodynamic Deterioration of Surgically Implanted Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.
Salaun E; Mahjoub H; Dahou A; Mathieu P; Larose É; Després JP; Rodés-Cabau J; Arsenault BJ; Puri R; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 72(3):241-251. PubMed ID: 30012316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dual-crosslinked bioprosthetic heart valves prepared by glutaraldehyde crosslinked pericardium and poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate exhibited improved antithrombogenicity and anticalcification properties.
Huang X; Zheng C; Ding K; Zhang S; Lei Y; Wei Q; Yang L; Wang Y
Acta Biomater; 2022 Dec; 154():244-258. PubMed ID: 36306983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration: a Review from a Basic Science Perspective.
Velho TR; Pereira RM; Fernandes F; Guerra NC; Ferreira R; Nobre Â
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 May; 37(2):239-250. PubMed ID: 34673516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.
Head SJ; Çelik M; Kappetein AP
Eur Heart J; 2017 Jul; 38(28):2183-2191. PubMed ID: 28444168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed surgical valves.
Simonato M; Dvir D
Heart; 2019 Mar; 105(Suppl 2):s38-s43. PubMed ID: 30846524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Structural deterioration of the Freestyle aortic valve: mode of presentation and mechanisms.
Mohammadi S; Baillot R; Voisine P; Mathieu P; Dagenais F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 16872969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biological Equivalence of GGTA-1 Glycosyltransferase Knockout and Standard Porcine Pericardial Tissue Using 90-Day Mitral Valve Implantation in Adolescent Sheep.
McGregor C; Salmonsmith J; Burriesci G; Byrne G
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2022 Jun; 13(3):363-372. PubMed ID: 34820778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Simulating the time evolving geometry, mechanical properties, and fibrous structure of bioprosthetic heart valve leaflets under cyclic loading.
Zhang W; Motiwale S; Hsu MC; Sacks MS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Nov; 123():104745. PubMed ID: 34482092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Association of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Leaflet Calcification on Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes.
Zhang B; Salaun E; Côté N; Wu Y; Mahjoub H; Mathieu P; Dahou A; Zenses AS; Clisson M; Pibarot P; Clavel MA
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 76(15):1737-1748. PubMed ID: 33032735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN
JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation in Degenerated Bioprosthetic Valves.
Mankad SV; Aldea GS; Ho NM; Mankad R; Pislaru S; Rodriguez LL; Whisenant B; Zimmerman K
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Aug; 31(8):845-859. PubMed ID: 29937412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Preferability of bioprostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement--a comparative study between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves.
Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K
Jpn Circ J; 1990 Feb; 54(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 2355449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis of a bioprosthetic valve: Questions to ponder before replacement of the valve.
Ram D; Armstrong G; Khanijow V; Sibal AK
J Card Surg; 2020 May; 35(5):1142-1144. PubMed ID: 32275092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bioprosthetic replacement after bioprosthesis failure: a hazardous choice?
Spampinato N; Gagliardi C; Pantaleo D; Fimiani L; Ascione R; De Robertis F; Musumeci A; Stassano P
Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S68-72. PubMed ID: 9930420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Increased utilization of bioprosthetic aortic valve technology:Trends, drivers, controversies and future directions.
Qi SS; Kelly RF; Bianco R; Schoen FJ
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2021 Jun; 19(6):537-546. PubMed ID: 33928833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
