245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33494734)
1. Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Yin SM; Liu YW; Liu YY; Yong CC; Wang CC; Li WF; Yeh CH
BMC Surg; 2021 Jan; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33494734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients.
Nassour I; Wang SC; Christie A; Augustine MM; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Choti MA; Mansour JC; Xie XJ; Polanco PM; Minter RM
Ann Surg; 2018 Jul; 268(1):151-157. PubMed ID: 28486387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of postoperative complications and long-term oncological outcomes in minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Kim SH; Lee B; Hwang HK; Lee JS; Han HS; Lee WJ; Yoon YS; Kang CM
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Mar; 29(3):329-337. PubMed ID: 34717038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.
Klompmaker S; van Hilst J; Wellner UF; Busch OR; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; Dokmak S; Festen S; Kerem M; Khatkov I; Lips DJ; Lombardo C; Luyer M; Manzoni A; Molenaar IQ; Rosso E; Saint-Marc O; Vansteenkiste F; Wittel UA; Bonsing B; Groot Koerkamp B; Abu Hilal M; Fuks D; Poves I; Keck T; Boggi U; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2020 Feb; 271(2):356-363. PubMed ID: 29864089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.
Chen K; Pan Y; Liu XL; Jiang GY; Wu D; Maher H; Cai XJ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 29169337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery: An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample.
Kiguchi G; Sugioka A; Uchida Y; Yoshikawa J; Nakauchi M; Kojima M; Tanahashi Y; Takahara T; Yasuda A; Suda K; Kato Y; Uyama I
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101577. PubMed ID: 33887674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive vs open pancreatoduodenectomy on oncological adequacy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ashouri Y; Ho K; Ho H; Hsu CH; Ghaderi I; Riall TS; Konstantinidis IT; Maegawa FB
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7302-7311. PubMed ID: 35178590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved outcomes with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with dilated pancreatic ducts: a prospective study.
Cos H; LeCompte MT; Srinivasa S; Zarate Rodriguez J; Woolsey CA; Williams G; Patel S; Khan A; Fields RC; Majella Doyle MB; Chapman WC; Strasberg SM; Hawkins WG; Hammill CW; Sanford DE
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3100-3109. PubMed ID: 34235587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.
Uijterwijk BA; Lemmers DHL; Bolm L; Luyer M; Koh YX; Mazzola M; Webber L; Kazemier G; Bannone E; Ramaekers M; Ielpo B; Wellner U; Koek S; Giani A; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Ann Surg; 2023 Sep; 278(3):e570-e579. PubMed ID: 36730852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms.
Bao PQ; Mazirka PO; Watkins KT
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Apr; 18(4):682-9. PubMed ID: 24234245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Totally laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: A propensity score matching analysis of short-term outcomes.
Mazzola M; Giani A; Crippa J; Morini L; Zironda A; Bertoglio CL; De Martini P; Magistro C; Ferrari G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 47(3 Pt B):674-680. PubMed ID: 33176959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy as minimally invasive surgery for periampullary tumors: a comparison of short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Mendoza AS; Han HS; Yoon YS; Cho JY; Choi Y
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2015 Dec; 22(12):819-24. PubMed ID: 26455716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Uijterwijk BA; Wei K; Kasai M; Ielpo B; Hilst JV; Chinnusamy P; Lemmers DHL; Burdio F; Senthilnathan P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M; Qin R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 37076411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of outcomes.
Lee W; Song KB; Hong S; Park Y; Kwak BJ; Jun E; Hwang DW; Kim S; Lee JH; Kim SC
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):881-890. PubMed ID: 36018360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive approaches increase postoperative complications in obese patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy during the initial development period: a propensity score matching study.
Wei TH; Su PJ; Lu WH; Liao TK; Wang CJ; Lai CH; Chiu PH; Su PF; Chao YJ; Shan YS
Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2770-2780. PubMed ID: 36477639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Getting Started with Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is It Worth It?
Liang S; Jayaraman S
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Sep; 25(9):712-9. PubMed ID: 26375771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
Uijterwijk BA; Kasai M; Lemmers DHL; Chinnusamy P; van Hilst J; Ielpo B; Wei K; Song KB; Kim SC; Klompmaker S; Jang JY; Herremans KM; Bencini L; Coratti A; Mazzola M; Menon KV; Goh BKP; Qin R; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Aug; 408(1):311. PubMed ID: 37581763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?
Gumbs AA; Chouillard E; Abu Hilal M; Croner R; Gayet B; Gagner M
Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5256-5267. PubMed ID: 33146810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
