These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33495010)
21. Laparoscopic and robotic sacropexy: retrospective review of learning curve experiences and follow-up. Pilka R; Gágyor D; Študentová M; Neubert D; Dzvinčuk P Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28925269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Short-term Outcomes of Non-robotic Single-incision Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Surgical Technique. Liu J; Kohn J; Wu C; Guan Z; Guan X J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):721-727. PubMed ID: 31146027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Are Two Meshes Better than One in Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse? Comparison of Single Anterior versus Anterior and Posterior Vaginal Mesh Procedures. d'Altilia N; Mancini V; Falagario U; Chirico M; Illiano E; Balzarro M; Annese P; Busetto GM; Bettocchi C; Cormio L; Sanguedolce F; Schiavina R; Brunocilla E; Costantini E; Carrieri G Urol Int; 2022; 106(3):282-290. PubMed ID: 34839298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Nygaard I; Brubaker L; Zyczynski HM; Cundiff G; Richter H; Gantz M; Fine P; Menefee S; Ridgeway B; Visco A; Warren LK; Zhang M; Meikle S JAMA; 2013 May; 309(19):2016-24. PubMed ID: 23677313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Integration of a Robotic Platform for Sacrocolpopexy in Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: A Novel Surgical Technique. Guan X; Guan Z; Koythong T; Liu J; Delgado S; Wang Q Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():109-114. PubMed ID: 33775785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Surgical cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparison of two robotic platforms. Glass Clark S; Shepherd JP; Sassani JC; Bonidie M Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 36282303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Perioperative Complications and Cost of Vaginal, Open Abdominal, and Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Vault Prolapse. Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Borah BJ; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 27682746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Perioperative outcomes after robotic versus vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Nguyen JN; Yang ST J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 31332703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial. Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Smith BC; Crisp CC; Kleeman SD; Yook E; Pauls RN Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 30807407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Short-Term Outcomes of Vaginal Hysterectomy at the Time of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy. Jones K; Thompson N; Imamoglu G; Solomon E; Rastegar V; Harmanli O Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e223-e226. PubMed ID: 32541298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A prospective randomized trial comparing Restorelle® Y mesh and flat mesh for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: 24-month outcomes. Ferrando CA; Paraiso MFR Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1565-1570. PubMed ID: 33471144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]