These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33496322)

  • 1. 'Sweet talk': framing the merits of a sugar tax in Australia.
    Anaf J; Fisher M; Handsley E; Baum F; Friel S
    Health Promot Int; 2021 Oct; 36(5):1334-1345. PubMed ID: 33496322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concepts of responsibility in the German media debate on sugar taxation: a qualitative framing analysis.
    Moerschel KS; von Philipsborn P; Hawkins B; McGill E
    Eur J Public Health; 2022 Apr; 32(2):267-272. PubMed ID: 34941999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Talking about a nanny nation: investigating the rhetoric framing public health debates in Australian news media.
    Chau JY; Kite J; Ronto R; Bhatti A; Bonfiglioli C
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Sep; 29(3):. PubMed ID: 31569205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'Choice should be made through… educated decisions not regressive dictates': discursive framings of a proposed 'sugar tax' in Bermuda: analysis of submissions to a government consultation.
    Williams S; Hill SE; Oyebode O
    Global Health; 2022 Oct; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 36271432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Policy Process And Non-State Actors' Influence On The 2014 Mexican Soda Tax.
    Carriedo A; Lock K; Hawkins B
    Health Policy Plan; 2020 Oct; 35(8):941-952. PubMed ID: 32672333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Case studies in nanny state name-calling: what can we learn?
    Magnusson RS
    Public Health; 2015 Aug; 129(8):1074-82. PubMed ID: 26074167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Framing the policy debate over spirits excise tax in Poland.
    Zatonski M; Hawkins B; McKee M
    Health Promot Int; 2018 Jun; 33(3):515-524. PubMed ID: 28011653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How are frames generated? Insights from the industry lobby against the sugar tax in Ireland.
    Campbell N; Mialon M; Reilly K; Browne S; Finucane FM
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Nov; 264():113215. PubMed ID: 32889504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Which nanny--the state or industry? Wowsers, teetotallers and the fun police in public health advocacy.
    Moore M; Yeatman H; Davey R
    Public Health; 2015 Aug; 129(8):1030-7. PubMed ID: 25933699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The political construction of public health nutrition problems: a framing analysis of parliamentary debates on junk-food marketing to children in Australia.
    Russell C; Lawrence M; Cullerton K; Baker P
    Public Health Nutr; 2020 Aug; 23(11):2041-2052. PubMed ID: 31948503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Framing of nutrition policy issues in the Australian news media, 2008-2018.
    Wise K; Cullerton K
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2021 Oct; 45(5):491-496. PubMed ID: 34411381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sugar Consumption Tax: A Good Idea or Not?
    Truscott J
    J Law Med; 2019 Apr; 26(3):681-690. PubMed ID: 30958657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generating political priority for regulatory interventions targeting obesity prevention: an Australian case study.
    Baker P; Gill T; Friel S; Carey G; Kay A
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Mar; 177():141-149. PubMed ID: 28161671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Framing health taxes: learning from low- and middle-income countries.
    Lwin KS; Koon AD; Rasanathan K; Ahsan A; Erku D; Mialon M; Perez-Leon S; Singh A; Mirza Z; Zuleta M; Adhikari SR; Acharya Y; Dao ST; Rasheed S; Paul J; Marten R
    BMJ Glob Health; 2023 Oct; 8(Suppl 8):. PubMed ID: 37832966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Framing tobacco control: the case of the Nigerian tobacco tax debates.
    Akin-Onitolo A; Hawkins B
    Health Policy Plan; 2022 Jan; 37(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 34369574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Framing health taxes: a scoping review.
    Koon AD; Marten R
    BMJ Glob Health; 2023 Oct; 8(Suppl 8):. PubMed ID: 37813439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should Australia tax sugar-sweetened beverages?
    Allen WMK; Allen KJ
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2020 Jan; 56(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 31782574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Case Study of the Philadelphia Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policymaking Process: Implications for Policy Development and Advocacy.
    Purtle J; Langellier B; Lê-Scherban F
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2018; 24(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 28257409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What Generates Attention to Health in Trade Policy-Making? Lessons From Success in Tobacco Control and Access to Medicines: A Qualitative Study of Australia and the (Comprehensive and Progressive) Trans-Pacific Partnership.
    Townsend B; Friel S; Schram A; Baum F; Labonté R
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2021 Oct; 10(10):613-624. PubMed ID: 32610761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: results from a 2011 national public opinion survey.
    Barry CL; Niederdeppe J; Gollust SE
    Am J Prev Med; 2013 Feb; 44(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 23332333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.