784 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33496829)
1. A deep learning model integrating mammography and clinical factors facilitates the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in breast cancer screening.
Liu H; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Wang L; Luo R; Wu H; Wu C; Zhang H; Tan W; Yin H; Wang D
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5902-5912. PubMed ID: 33496829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deep learning performance for detection and classification of microcalcifications on mammography.
Pesapane F; Trentin C; Ferrari F; Signorelli G; Tantrige P; Montesano M; Cicala C; Virgoli R; D'Acquisto S; Nicosia L; Origgi D; Cassano E
Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Nov; 7(1):69. PubMed ID: 37934382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined diagnosis of multiparametric MRI-based deep learning models facilitates differentiating triple-negative breast cancer from fibroadenoma magnetic resonance BI-RADS 4 lesions.
Yin HL; Jiang Y; Xu Z; Jia HH; Lin GW
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun; 149(6):2575-2584. PubMed ID: 35771263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep learning combining mammography and ultrasound images to predict the malignancy of BI-RADS US 4A lesions in women with dense breasts: a diagnostic study.
Yang Y; Zhong Y; Li J; Feng J; Gong C; Yu Y; Hu Y; Gu R; Wang H; Liu F; Mei J; Jiang X; Wang J; Yao Q; Wu W; Liu Q; Yao H
Int J Surg; 2024 May; 110(5):2604-2613. PubMed ID: 38348891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound-based deep learning in the establishment of a breast lesion risk stratification system: a multicenter study.
Gu Y; Xu W; Liu T; An X; Tian J; Ran H; Ren W; Chang C; Yuan J; Kang C; Deng Y; Wang H; Luo B; Guo S; Zhou Q; Xue E; Zhan W; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Chen M; Gu Y; Chen W; Zhang Y; Li J; Cong L; Zhu L; Wang H; Jiang Y
Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2954-2964. PubMed ID: 36418619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI for the assessment of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications.
Bennani-Baiti B; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188679. PubMed ID: 29190656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scoring System to Stratify Malignancy Risks for Mammographic Microcalcifications Based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5th Edition Descriptors.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Choi EJ; Kim JA
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1646-1652. PubMed ID: 31854152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study.
Yu LF; Dai CC; Zhu LX; Xu XJ; Yan HJ; Jiang CX; Bao LY
BMC Med Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38807064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonmasslike enhancement at breast MR imaging: the added value of mammography and US for lesion categorization.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Trop I; Chopier J; David J; Lalonde L; Darai E; Rouzier R; Uzan S
Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 21771958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of diagnostic performances in the evaluation of breast microcalcifications: synthetic mammography versus full-field digital mammography.
Kilic P; Sendur HN; Gultekin S; Gultekin II; Cindil E; Cerit M
Ir J Med Sci; 2022 Aug; 191(4):1891-1897. PubMed ID: 34472041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening.
Dodelzon K; Simon K; Dou E; Levy AD; Michaels AY; Askin G; Katzen JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 32255687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging and mammography on patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Li E; Li J; Song Y; Xue M; Zhou C
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111217. PubMed ID: 25365327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for patients with BI-RADS 3-4 microcalcifications.
Jiang Y; Lou J; Wang S; Zhao Y; Wang C; Wang D
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99669. PubMed ID: 24927476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The added value of an artificial intelligence system in assisting radiologists on indeterminate BI-RADS 0 mammograms.
Yi C; Tang Y; Ouyang R; Zhang Y; Cao Z; Yang Z; Wu S; Han M; Xiao J; Chang P; Ma J
Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):1528-1537. PubMed ID: 34528107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnostic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists.
Lee AY; Wisner DJ; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Arasu VA; Feig SA; Hargreaves J; Ojeda-Fournier H; Bassett LW; Wells CJ; De Guzman J; Flowers CI; Campbell JE; Elson SL; Retallack H; Joe BN
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 27793579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification.
Gülsün M; Demirkazik FB; Ariyürek M
Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 12927667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
