379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33497718)
1. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
Bidelman GM
Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation.
Bidelman GM; Davis MK; Pridgen MH
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():149-160. PubMed ID: 29871826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attention reinforces human corticofugal system to aid speech perception in noise.
Price CN; Bidelman GM
Neuroimage; 2021 Jul; 235():118014. PubMed ID: 33794356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Afferent-efferent connectivity between auditory brainstem and cortex accounts for poorer speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults.
Bidelman GM; Price CN; Shen D; Arnott SR; Alain C
Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 382():107795. PubMed ID: 31479953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
Bidelman GM
Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR).
Shukla B; Bidelman GM
Brain Res; 2021 Nov; 1771():147643. PubMed ID: 34473999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High gamma cortical processing of continuous speech in younger and older listeners.
Kulasingham JP; Brodbeck C; Presacco A; Kuchinsky SE; Anderson S; Simon JZ
Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 222():117291. PubMed ID: 32835821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neural generators of the frequency-following response elicited to stimuli of low and high frequency: A magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study.
Gorina-Careta N; Kurkela JLO; Hämäläinen J; Astikainen P; Escera C
Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117866. PubMed ID: 33592244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional changes in inter- and intra-hemispheric cortical processing underlying degraded speech perception.
Bidelman GM; Howell M
Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):581-590. PubMed ID: 26386346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brainstem correlates of cochlear nonlinearity measured via the scalp-recorded frequency-following response.
Bidelman GM; Bhagat S
Neuroreport; 2020 Jul; 31(10):702-707. PubMed ID: 32453027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The possible role of early-stage phase-locked neural activities in speech-in-noise perception in human adults across age and hearing loss.
Mai G; Howell P
Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 427():108647. PubMed ID: 36436293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cortical-brainstem interplay during speech perception in older adults with and without hearing loss.
Lai J; Alain C; Bidelman GM
Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1075368. PubMed ID: 36816123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aging effects on the neural representation and perception of consonant transition cues.
Poe AA; Karawani H; Anderson S
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109034. PubMed ID: 38781768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between the frequency difference limen and an index based on principal component analysis of the frequency-following response of normal hearing listeners.
Zhang X; Gong Q
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():255-264. PubMed ID: 27956352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
Ross B
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review.
Anderson S; Kraus N
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Oct; 21(9):575-85. PubMed ID: 21241645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
