379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33497718)
21. Test-Retest Reliability of Dual-Recorded Brainstem versus Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials to Speech.
Bidelman GM; Pousson M; Dugas C; Fehrenbach A
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):164-174. PubMed ID: 29401063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multiple Cases of Auditory Neuropathy Illuminate the Importance of Subcortical Neural Synchrony for Speech-in-noise Recognition and the Frequency-following Response.
White-Schwoch T; Anderson S; Krizman J; Bonacina S; Nicol T; Bradlow AR; Kraus N
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):605-619. PubMed ID: 34619687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A; Bartlett E
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e91-e103. PubMed ID: 26583482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Duplex perception reveals brainstem auditory representations are modulated by listeners' ongoing percept for speech.
Rizzi R; Bidelman GM
Cereb Cortex; 2023 Sep; 33(18):10076-10086. PubMed ID: 37522248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults.
Anderson S; Parbery-Clark A; Yi HG; Kraus N
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 21730859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Frequency-Following Responses to Speech Sounds Are Highly Conserved across Species and Contain Cortical Contributions.
Gnanateja GN; Rupp K; Llanos F; Remick M; Pernia M; Sadagopan S; Teichert T; Abel TJ; Chandrasekaran B
eNeuro; 2021; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 34799409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
Bidelman G; Powers L
Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dichotic phase effects on frequency following responses reveal phase variant and invariant harmonic distortion products.
Gnanateja GN; Maruthy S
Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():84-99. PubMed ID: 31212114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Musical training orchestrates coordinated neuroplasticity in auditory brainstem and cortex to counteract age-related declines in categorical vowel perception.
Bidelman GM; Alain C
J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(3):1240-9. PubMed ID: 25609638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Topographic recordings of auditory evoked potentials to speech: subcortical and cortical responses.
Bellier L; Bouchet P; Jeanvoine A; Valentin O; Thai-Van H; Caclin A
Psychophysiology; 2015 Apr; 52(4):594-9. PubMed ID: 25329609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
Vander Werff KR; Rieger B
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e200-e214. PubMed ID: 28319479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Attentional Modulation of the Cortical Contribution to the Frequency-Following Response Evoked by Continuous Speech.
Schüller A; Schilling A; Krauss P; Rampp S; Reichenbach T
J Neurosci; 2023 Nov; 43(44):7429-7440. PubMed ID: 37793908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of subcortical auditory processing and cognitive measures on cocktail party listening in younger and older adults.
Jain C; Dwarakanath VM; G A
Int J Audiol; 2019 Feb; 58(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 30646763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
Tichko P; Skoe E
Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cortical Correlates of the Auditory Frequency-Following and Onset Responses: EEG and fMRI Evidence.
Coffey EBJ; Musacchia G; Zatorre RJ
J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(4):830-838. PubMed ID: 28123019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Aging degrades the neural encoding of simple and complex sounds in the human brainstem.
Clinard CG; Tremblay KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):590-9; quiz 643-4. PubMed ID: 24047946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Perception of speech in noise: neural correlates.
Song JH; Skoe E; Banai K; Kraus N
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2268-79. PubMed ID: 20681749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Investigating peripheral sources of speech-in-noise variability in listeners with normal audiograms.
Smith SB; Krizman J; Liu C; White-Schwoch T; Nicol T; Kraus N
Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():66-74. PubMed ID: 30504092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
