These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33498005)

  • 1. Impact of obesity on operative complications and outcome after sacrocolpopexy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wen Q; Zhao Z; Wen J; Yang Y; Wang L; Wu J; Miao Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():309-316. PubMed ID: 33498005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
    Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
    Maher C; Baessler K; Glazener CM; Adams EJ; Hagen S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD004014. PubMed ID: 17636742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.
    Maher C; Baessler K; Glazener CM; Adams EJ; Hagen S
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 18092333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.
    Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S
    Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
    van der Ploeg JM; van der Steen A; Oude Rengerink K; van der Vaart CH; Roovers JP
    BJOG; 2014 Apr; 121(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 24382099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early safety and efficacy outcomes of a novel technique of sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse.
    Rajshekhar S; Mukhopadhyay S; Morris E
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Nov; 135(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 27498595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse.
    Dandolu V; Akiyama M; Allenback G; Pathak P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):215-222. PubMed ID: 27562466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
    Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M
    Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes and feasibility of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among obese versus non-obese women.
    Thubert T; Naveau A; Letohic A; Villefranque V; Benifla JL; Deffieux X
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 120(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 23044008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Impact of Obesity on Intraoperative Complications and Prolapse Recurrence After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Turner L; Lavelle E; Lowder JL; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 27054791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of BMI on clinical outcomes following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Patnam R; Husk K; Sripad A; Barletta K; Dieter A; Geller EJ
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 32300933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Age on Complications Rate and Surgical Outcomes in Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy.
    Gluck O; Rusavy Z; Grinstein E; Abdelkhalek Y; Deval B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):753-758. PubMed ID: 35123043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: a review of current literature.
    Pushkar DY; Kasyan GR; Popov AA
    Curr Opin Urol; 2021 Nov; 31(6):531-536. PubMed ID: 34506336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sacrocolpopexy compared with transvaginal mesh surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang CY; Sun ZJ; Yang J; Xu T; Zhu L; Lang JH
    BJOG; 2021 Jan; 128(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 32426903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.