These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33498022)

  • 1. Estimating blood flow velocity using time-resolved 3D angiography and a derived physical law of contrast media.
    Chen KK; Lin CJ; Guo WY; Chu WF; Wu YT
    Physiol Meas; 2021 Mar; 42(2):025007. PubMed ID: 33498022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of Blood Velocity with 4D Digital Subtraction Angiography Using the Shifted Least-Squares Method.
    Wu Y; Shaughnessy G; Hoffman CA; Oberstar EL; Schafer S; Schubert T; Falk KL; Davis BJ; Mistretta CA; Strother CM; Speidel MA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Oct; 39(10):1871-1877. PubMed ID: 30213811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peak velocity measurements in tortuous arteries with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of multidirectional velocity encoding.
    Schubert T; Bieri O; Pansini M; Stippich C; Santini F
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 24300842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison of 4D-DSA with 3D-DSA Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations in Cerebral Aneurysms.
    Lang S; Hoelter P; Birkhold AI; Schmidt M; Endres J; Strother C; Doerfler A; Luecking H
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1505-1510. PubMed ID: 31467234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.
    Frayne R; Grist TM; Korosec FR; Willig DS; Swan JS; Turski PA; Mistretta CA
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Dec; 8(6):366-88. PubMed ID: 9402678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of chronic carotid artery occlusion by non-contrast 3D-MERGE MR vessel wall imaging: comparison with 3D-TOF-MRA, contrast-enhanced MRA, and DSA.
    Zhang J; Ding S; Zhao H; Sun B; Li X; Zhou Y; Wan J; Degnan AJ; Xu J; Zhu C
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5805-5814. PubMed ID: 32529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of algorithms for estimating blood flow velocities in cerebral arteries based on the transport information of contrast agent: An in silico study.
    Wu Q; Vassilevski Y; Simakov S; Liang F
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Feb; 141():105040. PubMed ID: 34809965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 4D Digital Subtraction Angiography for the Temporal Flow Visualization of Intracranial Aneurysms and Vascular Malformations.
    Kato N; Yuki I; Hataoka S; Dahmani C; Otani K; Abe Y; Kakizaki S; Nagayama G; Maruyama F; Ikemura A; Kan I; Kodama T; Ishibashi T; Murayama Y
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2020 Dec; 29(12):105327. PubMed ID: 32992207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative 4D-Digital Subtraction Angiography to Assess Changes in Hepatic Arterial Flow during Transarterial Embolization: A Feasibility Study in a Swine Model.
    Meram E; Harari C; Shaughnessy G; Wagner M; Brace CL; Mistretta CA; Speidel MA; Laeseke PF
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1286-1292. PubMed ID: 31160194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of blood velocity measurements between ultrasound Doppler and accelerated phase-contrast MR angiography in small arteries with disturbed flow.
    Jiang J; Strother C; Johnson K; Baker S; Consigny D; Wieben O; Zagzebski J
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 56(6):1755-73. PubMed ID: 21346280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utility of noncontrast-enhanced time-resolved four-dimensional MR angiography with a vessel-selective technique for intracranial arteriovenous malformations.
    Fujima N; Osanai T; Shimizu Y; Yoshida A; Harada T; Nakayama N; Kudo K; Houkin K; Shirato H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):834-45. PubMed ID: 26970348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for visualization and quantification of endovascular aortic prosthesis, their endoleaks and aneurysm sacs at 1.5 T.
    Salehi Ravesh M; Langguth P; Pfarr JA; Schupp J; Trentmann J; Koktzoglou I; Edelman RR; Graessner J; Greiser A; Hautemann D; Hennemuth A; Both M; Jansen O; Hövener JB; Schäfer JP
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 60():164-172. PubMed ID: 31075419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating Pulsatile Blood Flow Parameters from Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Chen KK; Lin CJ; Chu WF
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():3626-3629. PubMed ID: 34892023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 4D ASL-based MR angiography for visualization of distal arteries and leptomeningeal collateral vessels in moyamoya disease: a comparison of techniques.
    Togao O; Hiwatashi A; Obara M; Yamashita K; Momosaka D; Nishimura A; Arimura K; Hata N; Yoshimoto K; Iihara K; Van Cauteren M; Honda H
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4871-4881. PubMed ID: 29737389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: pre- and postoperative assessment with breath-hold MR imaging techniques.
    Kreitner KF; Ley S; Kauczor HU; Mayer E; Kramm T; Pitton MB; Krummenauer F; Thelen M
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):535-43. PubMed ID: 15215554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Remonda L; Senn P; Barth A; Arnold M; Lövblad KO; Schroth G
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002 Feb; 23(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 11847044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis.
    Hathout GM; Duh MJ; El-Saden SM
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Oct; 24(9):1747-56. PubMed ID: 14561597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.
    Anzalone N; Scomazzoni F; Castellano R; Strada L; Righi C; Politi LS; Kirchin MA; Chiesa R; Scotti G
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-resolved angiography: Past, present, and future.
    Grist TM; Mistretta CA; Strother CM; Turski PA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 36(6):1273-86. PubMed ID: 22566099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.