These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33498498)

  • 1. A Two-Scale Multi-Resolution Topologically Optimized Multi-Material Design of 3D Printed Craniofacial Bone Implants.
    Park J; Zobaer T; Sutradhar A
    Micromachines (Basel); 2021 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33498498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Designing patient-specific 3D printed craniofacial implants using a novel topology optimization method.
    Sutradhar A; Park J; Carrau D; Nguyen TH; Miller MJ; Paulino GH
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Jul; 54(7):1123-35. PubMed ID: 26660897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conceptual design of compliant bone scaffolds by full-scale topology optimization.
    Smit T; Koppen S; Ferguson SJ; Helgason B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jul; 143():105886. PubMed ID: 37150137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Topological design and biomechanical evaluation for 3D printed multi-segment artificial vertebral implants.
    Kang J; Dong E; Li X; Guo Z; Shi L; Li D; Wang L
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Aug; 127():112250. PubMed ID: 34225889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A general multi-objective topology optimization methodology developed for customized design of pelvic prostheses.
    Iqbal T; Wang L; Li D; Dong E; Fan H; Fu J; Hu C
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jul; 69():8-16. PubMed ID: 31229384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental validation of 3D printed patient-specific implants using digital image correlation and finite element analysis.
    Sutradhar A; Park J; Carrau D; Miller MJ
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Sep; 52():8-17. PubMed ID: 24992729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Additively manufactured controlled porous orthopedic joint replacement designs to reduce bone stress shielding: a systematic review.
    Safavi S; Yu Y; Robinson DL; Gray HA; Ackland DC; Lee PVS
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Jan; 18(1):42. PubMed ID: 36647070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An optimization approach for studying the effect of lattice unit cell's design-based factors on additively manufactured poly methyl methacrylate cranio-implant.
    Sivakumar NK; Palaniyappan S; Sekar V; Alodhayb A; Braim M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 May; 141():105791. PubMed ID: 37004304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interbody fusion cage design using integrated global layout and local microstructure topology optimization.
    Lin CY; Hsiao CC; Chen PQ; Hollister SJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1747-54. PubMed ID: 15303018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical characterization of structurally porous biomaterials built via additive manufacturing: experiments, predictive models, and design maps for load-bearing bone replacement implants.
    Melancon D; Bagheri ZS; Johnston RB; Liu L; Tanzer M; Pasini D
    Acta Biomater; 2017 Nov; 63():350-368. PubMed ID: 28927929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical performance of additively manufactured meta-biomaterials.
    Zadpoor AA
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Feb; 85():41-59. PubMed ID: 30590181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards multi-dynamic mechano-biological optimization of 3D-printed scaffolds to foster bone regeneration.
    Metz C; Duda GN; Checa S
    Acta Biomater; 2020 Jan; 101():117-127. PubMed ID: 31669697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials.
    Zadpoor AA
    J Mater Chem B; 2019 Jul; 7(26):4088-4117. PubMed ID: 31701985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite Element Analysis of Orthopedic Hip Implant with Functionally Graded Bioinspired Lattice Structures.
    Kladovasilakis N; Tsongas K; Tzetzis D
    Biomimetics (Basel); 2020 Sep; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 32932596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Topology Optimization of the Clutch Lever Manufactured by Additive Manufacturing.
    Mikulikova A; Mesicek J; Karger J; Hajnys J; Ma QP; Sliva A; Smiraus J; Srnicek D; Cienciala S; Pagac M
    Materials (Basel); 2023 May; 16(9):. PubMed ID: 37176392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Additively Manufactured Tantalum Implants for Repairing Bone Defects: A Systematic Review.
    Qian H; Lei T; Lei P; Hu Y
    Tissue Eng Part B Rev; 2021 Apr; 27(2):166-180. PubMed ID: 32799765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational design and fabrication of a novel bioresorbable cage for tibial tuberosity advancement application.
    Castilho M; Rodrigues J; Vorndran E; Gbureck U; Quental C; Folgado J; Fernandes PR
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jan; 65():344-355. PubMed ID: 27631172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Solid Stress-Distribution-Oriented Design and Topology Optimization of 3D-Printed Heterogeneous Lattice Structures with Light Weight and High Specific Rigidity.
    Li B; Shen C
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Jul; 14(14):. PubMed ID: 35890584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Topology optimization of fixed complete denture framework.
    Park J; Lee D; Sutradhar A
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 Jun; 35(6):e3193. PubMed ID: 30815988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of design and postprocessing parameters on the degradation behavior and mechanical properties of additively manufactured magnesium scaffolds.
    Kopp A; Derra T; Müther M; Jauer L; Schleifenbaum JH; Voshage M; Jung O; Smeets R; Kröger N
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Oct; 98():23-35. PubMed ID: 30959185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.