These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33500910)
1. Social Impact of Recharging Activity in Long-Term HRI and Verbal Strategies to Manage User Expectations During Recharge. Deshmukh A; Lohan KS; Rajendran G; Aylett R Front Robot AI; 2018; 5():23. PubMed ID: 33500910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should robots be polite? Expectations about politeness in human-robot interaction. Lumer E; Buschmeier H Front Robot AI; 2023; 10():1242127. PubMed ID: 38099008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and Testing of Psychological Conflict Resolution Strategies for Assertive Robots to Resolve Human-Robot Goal Conflict. Babel F; Kraus JM; Baumann M Front Robot AI; 2020; 7():591448. PubMed ID: 33718437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Self-Explaining Social Robots: An Explainable Behavior Generation Architecture for Human-Robot Interaction. Stange S; Hassan T; Schröder F; Konkol J; Kopp S Front Artif Intell; 2022; 5():866920. PubMed ID: 35573901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Meta-Analysis on Remote HRI and In-Person HRI: What Is a Socially Assistive Robot to Do? Liang N; Nejat G Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. More Than a Feeling-Interrelation of Trust Layers in Human-Robot Interaction and the Role of User Dispositions and State Anxiety. Miller L; Kraus J; Babel F; Baumann M Front Psychol; 2021; 12():592711. PubMed ID: 33912098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of politeness and performance quality of android robots on future interaction decisions: a conversational design perspective. Saeki W; Ueda Y Front Robot AI; 2024; 11():1393456. PubMed ID: 38863781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Politeness in Human-Robot Interaction: A Multi-Experiment Study with Non-Humanoid Robots. Kumar S; Itzhak E; Edan Y; Nimrod G; Sarne-Fleischmann V; Tractinsky N Int J Soc Robot; 2022; 14(8):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 35996386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trust in socially assistive robots: Considerations for use in rehabilitation. Langer A; Feingold-Polak R; Mueller O; Kellmeyer P; Levy-Tzedek S Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2019 Sep; 104():231-239. PubMed ID: 31348963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors influencing consumers' willingness to accept service robots: Based on online reviews of Chinese hotels. Chang C; Shao B; Li Y; Zhang Y Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1016579. PubMed ID: 36304874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physiological data for affective computing in HRI with anthropomorphic service robots: the AFFECT-HRI data set. Heinisch JS; Kirchhoff J; Busch P; Wendt J; von Stryk O; David K Sci Data; 2024 Apr; 11(1):333. PubMed ID: 38575624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying Features that Enhance Older Adults' Acceptance of Robots: A Mixed Methods Study. Chu L; Chen HW; Cheng PY; Ho P; Weng IT; Yang PL; Chien SE; Tu YC; Yang CC; Wang TM; Fung HH; Yeh SL Gerontology; 2019; 65(4):441-450. PubMed ID: 30844813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sequential model based on human cognitive processing to robot acceptance. Saeki W; Ueda Y Front Robot AI; 2024; 11():1362044. PubMed ID: 38560097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving gesture-based interaction between an assistive bathing robot and older adults via user training on the gestural commands. Werner C; Kardaris N; Koutras P; Zlatintsi A; Maragos P; Bauer JM; Hauer K Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2020; 87():103996. PubMed ID: 31855713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers. Wang RH; Sudhama A; Begum M; Huq R; Mihailidis A Int Psychogeriatr; 2017 Jan; 29(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 27660047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Promoting Interactions Between Humans and Robots Using Robotic Emotional Behavior. Ficocelli M; Terao J; Nejat G IEEE Trans Cybern; 2016 Dec; 46(12):2911-2923. PubMed ID: 26552105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multi-perspective evaluation of a service robot for seniors: the voice of different stakeholders. Bedaf S; Marti P; Amirabdollahian F; de Witte L Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Aug; 13(6):592-599. PubMed ID: 28758532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Bio-inspired Motivational Decision Making System for Social Robots Based on the Perception of the User. Maroto-Gómez M; Castro-González Á; Castillo JC; Malfaz M; Salichs MA Sensors (Basel); 2018 Aug; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 30115836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development. Honig S; Oron-Gilad T Front Psychol; 2018; 9():861. PubMed ID: 29962981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Tactile Ethics of Soft Robotics: Designing Wisely for Human-Robot Interaction. Arnold T; Scheutz M Soft Robot; 2017 Jun; 4(2):81-87. PubMed ID: 29182090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]