These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33500935)

  • 1. Rationale, Implementation and Evaluation of Assistive Strategies for an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton.
    Toxiri S; Koopman AS; Lazzaroni M; Ortiz J; Power V; de Looze MP; O'Sullivan L; Caldwell DG
    Front Robot AI; 2018; 5():53. PubMed ID: 33500935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton for Manual Materials Handling: Reduction of Low Back Loading and Metabolic Effort during Repetitive Lifting.
    Schmalz T; Colienne A; Bywater E; Fritzsche L; Gärtner C; Bellmann M; Reimer S; Ernst M
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2022; 10(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 34763618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acceleration-based Assistive Strategy to Control a Back-support Exoskeleton for Load Handling: Preliminary Evaluation.
    Lazzaroni M; Toxiri S; Caldwell DG; Anastasi S; Monica L; Momi E; Ortiz J
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():625-630. PubMed ID: 31374700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.
    Zhou X; Zheng L
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2021; 9(3-4):167-185. PubMed ID: 34254566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In-Field Training of a Passive Back Exoskeleton Changes the Biomechanics of Logistic Workers.
    Schrøder Jakobsen L; Samani A; Desbrosses K; de Zee M; Madeleine P
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2024 Jun; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38869954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exoskeleton Application to Military Manual Handling Tasks.
    Proud JK; Lai DTH; Mudie KL; Carstairs GL; Billing DC; Garofolini A; Begg RK
    Hum Factors; 2022 May; 64(3):527-554. PubMed ID: 33203237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic and Static Assistive Strategies for a Tailored Occupational Back-Support Exoskeleton: Assessment on Real Tasks Carried Out by Railway Workers.
    Di Natali C; Poliero T; Fanti V; Sposito M; Caldwell DG
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 38391658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Real-Time Lift Detection Strategy for a Hip Exoskeleton.
    Chen B; Grazi L; Lanotte F; Vitiello N; Crea S
    Front Neurorobot; 2018; 12():17. PubMed ID: 29706881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of an unpowered ankle exoskeleton for walking assist.
    Leclair J; Pardoel S; Helal A; Doumit M
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 30132353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of two postural assist exoskeletons on biomechanical loading of the lumbar spine.
    Picchiotti MT; Weston EB; Knapik GG; Dufour JS; Marras WS
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Feb; 75():1-7. PubMed ID: 30509514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel approach to quantify the assistive torque profiles generated by passive back-support exoskeletons.
    Madinei S; Kim S; Park JH; Srinivasan D; Nussbaum MA
    J Biomech; 2022 Dec; 145():111363. PubMed ID: 36332510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical Analysis of Stoop and Free-Style Squat Lifting and Lowering with a Generic Back-Support Exoskeleton Model.
    Tröster M; Budde S; Maufroy C; Andersen MS; Rasmussen J; Schneider U; Bauernhansl T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 35897411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ergonomic Mechanical Design and Assessment of a Waist Assist Exoskeleton for Reducing Lumbar Loads During Lifting Task.
    Yong X; Yan Z; Wang C; Wang C; Li N; Wu X
    Micromachines (Basel); 2019 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 31295934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic assessment for low back-support exoskeletons during manual handling tasks.
    Xiang X; Tanaka M; Umeno S; Kikuchi Y; Kobayashi Y
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1289686. PubMed ID: 38026894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of Soft versus Rigid Back-Support Exoskeletons during a Lifting Task.
    Schwartz M; Theurel J; Desbrosses K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of a new passive back support exoskeleton.
    Koopman AS; Näf M; Baltrusch SJ; Kingma I; Rodriguez-Guerrero C; Babič J; de Looze MP; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2020 May; 105():109795. PubMed ID: 32423541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. sEMG-Triggered Fast Assistance Strategy for a Pneumatic Back Support Exoskeleton.
    Heo U; Feng J; Kim SJ; Kim J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():2175-2185. PubMed ID: 35925857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a machine-learning-driven active-passive upper-limb exoskeleton robot: Experimental human-in-the-loop study.
    Nasr A; Hunter J; Dickerson CR; McPhee J
    Wearable Technol; 2023; 4():e13. PubMed ID: 38487766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design of a Payload Adjustment Device for an Unpowered Lower-Limb Exoskeleton.
    Yun J; Kang O; Joe HM
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 21(12):. PubMed ID: 34208291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Equivalent Weight: Connecting Exoskeleton Effectiveness with Ergonomic Risk during Manual Material Handling.
    Di Natali C; Chini G; Toxiri S; Monica L; Anastasi S; Draicchio F; Caldwell DG; Ortiz J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33799947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.