These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 335011)
1. A computer program for ECG classification according to the Minnesota code. Duisterhout JS; May JF; van Herpen G; Distelbrink CA; Talmon JL; Plokker HW J Electrocardiol; 1977; 10(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 335011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improvement of automated electrocardiographic diagnosis by combination of computer interpretations of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram. Kors JA; van Herpen G; Willems JL; van Bemmel JH Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 70(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 1615877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The performance of three visual coding procedures and three computer programs in classification of electrocardiograms according to the Minnesota Code. Tuinstra CL; Rautaharju PM; Prineas RJ; Duisterhout JS J Electrocardiol; 1982 Oct; 15(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 6897261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Visual processing of 12,000 electrocardiograms according to the USPHS code and comparison of visual and automatic processing of about 6,000 electrocardiograms in accordance with the USPHS code]. Erpelt W Minerva Med; 1976 Oct; 67(48):3089-94. PubMed ID: 792723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilization of an automated ECG interpretation system in an ambulatory health service. Carel RS; Drory Y; Miller H; Kaplinski E Med Prog Technol; 1978 Nov; 6(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 366369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of computer-assigned Minnesota Codes with the visual standard method for new coronary heart disease events. Kors JA; Crow RS; Hannan PJ; Rautaharju PM; Folsom AR Am J Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 151(8):790-7. PubMed ID: 10965976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Automatic analysis of electrocardiogram with the Sicard system]. Nikitin NG; Sterostin LI Minerva Med; 1976 Oct; 67(48):3159-61. PubMed ID: 792732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of the automated diagnosis of the orthogonal ECG using the Pipberger program as compared with the standard ECG classified by the Minnesota code]. Loperfido F; Santarelli P; Zecchi P; Belloggi F; Carbonin PU Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1975; 20(9):1031-7. PubMed ID: 786331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical testing of the Sicard system for automatic evaluation of electrocardiograms]. Dorofeeva SS; Sobol JS; Kurotschkin JA; Sterostin LI; Tschestnowa AA Minerva Med; 1976 Oct; 67(48):3153-8. PubMed ID: 792731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a new computer program for Minnesota coding. Kors JA; van Herpen G; Wu J; Zhang Z; Prineas RJ; van Bemmel JH J Electrocardiol; 1996; 29 Suppl():83-8. PubMed ID: 9238383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The modular TNO-ECG/VCG interpretation system. I. Computer analysis of the electrocardiogram]. Plokker HW; Talmon JL; Distelbrink CA; van Bemmel JH; van Herpen G Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1976 Oct; 120(42):1785-90. PubMed ID: 790207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement and coding reliability of the Minnesota and Mayo electrocardiographic coding systems. Kottke TE; Daida H; Bailey KR; Hammill SC; Crow RS J Electrocardiol; 1998 Oct; 31(4):303-12. PubMed ID: 9817213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combination of diagnostic classifications from ECG and VCG computer interpretations. van Bemmel JH; Kors JA; van Herpen G J Electrocardiol; 1992; 25 Suppl():126-30. PubMed ID: 1297678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalences and association of ECG findings and cardiovascular risk factor in Shinawatra employees. Sriratanaviriyakul N; Kangkagate C; Krittayaphong R J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jan; 93 Suppl 1():S1-10. PubMed ID: 20364551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Results of the automatic analysis of a group of 2,250 electrocardiograms examined with the HP4 system and supplied by 13 hospitals associated with a single computer center]. Binda G; Schweiger C; Liverani M Minerva Med; 1976 Oct; 67(48):3067-76. PubMed ID: 792721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodology of ECG interpretation in the Louvain program. Brohet CR; Derwael C; Robert A; Fesler R Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 2233388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The coming of age of computerized ECG processing: can it replace the cardiologist in epidemiological studies and clinical trials? Kors JA; van Herpen G Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1161-7. PubMed ID: 11604912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The advantage of modular software design in computerized ECG analysis. Talmon JL; van Bemmel JH Med Inform (Lond); 1986; 11(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 3526027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-assisted interpretation of electro- and vectorcardiograms. Chapter IV. Achievements in the field of computer-assisted interpretation of electrocardiograms. Brohet C Rev Inst Hyg Mines (Hasselt); 1980; 35(4):201-64. PubMed ID: 7015461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]