214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33502572)
1. Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center.
Kagiyama K; Mitsutake Y; Ueno T; Sakai S; Nakamura T; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki M; Chibana H; Itaya N; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y
Heart Vessels; 2021 Jul; 36(7):955-964. PubMed ID: 33502572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Mahmud E; Naghi J; Ang L; Harrison J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(13):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 28683937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion.
Harrison J; Ang L; Naghi J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Mahmud E
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jul; 19(5 Pt A):526-531. PubMed ID: 29221959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report.
Smitson CC; Ang L; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M; Mahmud E
J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):152-156. PubMed ID: 29335386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Traditional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort.
Patel TM; Shah SC; Soni YY; Radadiya RC; Patel GA; Tiwari PO; Pancholy SB
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(5):e008888. PubMed ID: 32406263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of Robotically Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Allencherril J; Hyman D; Loya A; Jneid H; Alam M
J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 31(8):199-203. PubMed ID: 31088991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First Experience of Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan.
Kagiyama K; Ueno T; Mitsutake Y; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y
Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 58(23):3415-3419. PubMed ID: 31366804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Initial Australian Experience.
Leung J; French J; Xu J; Kachwalla H; Kaddapu K; Badie T; Mussap C; Rajaratnam R; Leung D; Lo S; Juergens C
Heart Lung Circ; 2024 Apr; 33(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 38365501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach.
Smilowitz NR; Moses JW; Sosa FA; Lerman B; Qureshi Y; Dalton KE; Privitera LT; Canone-Weber D; Singh V; Leon MB; Weisz G
J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 26(7):318-21. PubMed ID: 24993988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During COVID-19 Pandemic: Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness With Procedural Distancing.
Sooknanan NN; Memon S; George JC
J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E87-E91. PubMed ID: 34928816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.
Weisz G; Metzger DC; Caputo RP; Delgado JA; Marshall JJ; Vetrovec GW; Reisman M; Waksman R; Granada JF; Novack V; Moses JW; Carrozza JP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 61(15):1596-600. PubMed ID: 23500318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fluoroscopy pulse rate reduction during diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: An evaluation of radiation dose, procedure complications and outcomes.
Hansen JW; Foy A; Schmidt T; Ghahramani M; Chambers CE
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 89(4):665-670. PubMed ID: 27121130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the R-One robotic system for percutaneous coronary intervention: the R-EVOLUTION study.
Durand E; Sabatier R; Smits PC; Verheye S; Pereira B; Fajadet J
EuroIntervention; 2023 Apr; 18(16):e1339-e1347. PubMed ID: 36602883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study.
Georges JL; Belle L; Meunier L; Dechery T; Khalifé K; Pecheux M; Elhaddad S; Amabile N; Pansieri M; Ballout J; Marchand X; Rouault G; Leddet P; Nugue O; Lucke N; Cattan S;
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Mar; 110(3):179-187. PubMed ID: 28117244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and feasibility of robotic assisted percutaneous coronary intervention compared to standard percutaneous coronary intervention- a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tripathi B; Sharma P; Arora S; Murtaza M; Singh A; Solanki D; Kapadia S; Sharma A; Pershad A
Indian Heart J; 2021; 73(5):549-554. PubMed ID: 34627567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system.
Granada JF; Delgado JA; Uribe MP; Fernandez A; Blanco G; Leon MB; Weisz G
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Apr; 4(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 21511227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resource Utilization During Elective Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Mangels D; Fregoso A; Ang L; Mahmud E
J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 32(12):E321-E325. PubMed ID: 32829309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longitudinal Geographic Miss (LGM) in Robotic Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
Bezerra HG; Mehanna E; W Vetrovec G; A Costa M; Weisz G
J Interv Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 28(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 26489972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A retrospective study of radiation dose measurements comparing different cath lab X-ray systems in a sample population of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions.
McNeice AH; Brooks M; Hanratty CG; Stevenson M; Spratt JC; Walsh SJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 92(3):E254-E261. PubMed ID: 29411518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
