148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33503122)
21. Antiadherent and antibacterial properties of stainless steel and NiTi orthodontic wires coated with silver against Lactobacillus acidophilus--an in vitro study.
Mhaske AR; Shetty PC; Bhat NS; Ramachandra CS; Laxmikanth SM; Nagarahalli K; Tekale PD
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():40. PubMed ID: 26576557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cross-section dimensions and mechanical properties of esthetic orthodontic coated archwires.
da Silva DL; Mattos CT; Sant' Anna EF; Ruellas AC; Elias CN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S85-91. PubMed ID: 23540641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Initial arch wires for alignment of crooked teeth with fixed orthodontic braces.
Wang Y; Jian F; Lai W; Zhao Z; Yang Z; Liao Z; Shi Z; Wu T; Millett DT; McIntyre GT; Hickman J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Apr; (4):CD007859. PubMed ID: 20393961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of esthetic brackets' resistance to torsional forces from the archwire.
Nishio C; Mendes Ade M; Almeida MA; Tanaka E; Tanne K; Elias CN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19121499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mechanical properties of coated superelastic archwires in conventional and self-ligating orthodontic brackets.
Elayyan F; Silikas N; Bearn D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 20152677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.
Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sliding resistance of polycarbonate self-ligating brackets and stainless steel esthetic archwires.
Hiroce M; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN; Miguel JA
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 23021118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of surface roughness and hardness of three different brands of esthetic coated NiTi archwires: invitro study.
Aboalnaga AA; Shahawi AME
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):816. PubMed ID: 37898800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of the frictional characteristics of five initial alignment wires and stainless steel brackets at three bracket to wire angulations--an in vitro study.
Dickson JA; Jones SP; Davies EH
Br J Orthod; 1994 Feb; 21(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8199160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A prospective cohort study assessing the appearance of retrieved aesthetic orthodontic archwires.
Collier S; Pandis N; Johal A; Qureshi U; Sharma PK; Fleming PS
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2018 Feb; 21(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 29205804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterization and coating stability evaluation of nickel-titanium orthodontic esthetic wires: an in vivo study.
Argalji N; Silva EMD; Cury-Saramago A; Mattos CT
Braz Oral Res; 2017 Aug; 31():e68. PubMed ID: 28832715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Elastic properties of alternative versus single-stranded leveling archwires.
Rucker BK; Kusy RP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):528-41. PubMed ID: 12439482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.
Vaughan JL; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 7817958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Static frictional force and surface roughness of nickel-titanium arch wires.
Prososki RR; Bagby MD; Erickson LC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 1927985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating the Surface Characteristics of Stainless Steel, TMA, Timolium, and Titanium-niobium Wires: An in vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
Babu KP; Keerthi VN; Madathody D; Prasanna AL; Gopinath V; Kumar MS; Kumar AN
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 May; 17(5):372-6. PubMed ID: 27443362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of frictional forces between ceramic brackets and archwires of different alloys compared with metal brackets.
Guerrero AP; Guariza Filho O; Tanaka O; Camargo ES; Vieira S
Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20339712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of friction between ceramic brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
Angolkar PV; Kapila S; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Dec; 98(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 2248227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
Husain N; Kumar A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
