These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33503181)

  • 1. Comparison of Different Ultrasound Classification Systems of Thyroid Nodules for Identifying Malignant Potential: A Cross-sectional Study.
    Chen H; Ye J; Song J; You Y; Chen W; Liu Y
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e2126. PubMed ID: 33503181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different systems of ultrasound (US) risk stratification for malignancy in elderly patients with thyroid nodules. Real world experience.
    Di Fermo F; Sforza N; Rosmarin M; Morosan Allo Y; Parisi C; Santamaria J; Pacenza N; Zuk C; Faingold C; Ferraro F; Meroño T; Brenta G
    Endocrine; 2020 Aug; 69(2):331-338. PubMed ID: 32291736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic Performance of Six Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
    Kim DH; Kim SW; Basurrah MA; Lee J; Hwang SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jun; 220(6):791-803. PubMed ID: 36752367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Malignancy risk stratification and FNA recommendations for thyroid nodules: A comparison of ACR TI-RADS, AACE/ACE/AME and ATA guidelines.
    Peng JY; Pan FS; Wang W; Wang Z; Shan QY; Lin JH; Luo J; Zheng YL; Hu HT; Ruan SM; Liang JY; Xie XY; Lu MD
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(6):102625. PubMed ID: 32668355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences between ATA, AACE/ACE/AME and ACR TI-RADS ultrasound classifications performance in identifying cytological high-risk thyroid nodules.
    Lauria Pantano A; Maddaloni E; Briganti SI; Beretta Anguissola G; Perrella E; Taffon C; Palermo A; Pozzilli P; Manfrini S; Crescenzi A
    Eur J Endocrinol; 2018 Jun; 178(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 29626008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The TNAPP web-based algorithm improves thyroid nodule management in clinical practice: A retrospective validation study.
    Triggiani V; Lisco G; Renzulli G; Frasoldati A; Guglielmi R; Garber J; Papini E
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():1080159. PubMed ID: 36778596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnostic Value of American Thyroid Association Guidelines,American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System,and Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Alone and Combined With BRAF
    Lin Y; Luo YK; Li J; Ren XY; Wang HW
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2023 Dec; 45(6):921-928. PubMed ID: 38173102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of ACR-TIRADS, American Thyroid Association (ATA), and EU-TIRADS guidelines in detecting thyroid malignancy.
    Koc AM; Adıbelli ZH; Erkul Z; Sahin Y; Dilek I
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Dec; 133():109390. PubMed ID: 33181485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic performance of adult-based ATA and ACR-TIRADS ultrasound risk stratification systems in pediatric thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kim PH; Yoon HM; Hwang J; Lee JS; Jung AY; Cho YA; Baek JH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7450-7463. PubMed ID: 33864505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Thyroid Malignancy: Diagnostic Performance of Seven Society Guidelines Applied to 2000 Thyroid Nodules.
    Ha EJ; Na DG; Baek JH; Sung JY; Kim JH; Kang SY
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):893-900. PubMed ID: 29465333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can ultrasound systems for risk stratification of thyroid nodules identify follicular carcinoma?
    Castellana M; Piccardo A; Virili C; Scappaticcio L; Grani G; Durante C; Giovanella L; Trimboli P
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Apr; 128(4):250-259. PubMed ID: 31899594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound systems for risk stratification of thyroid nodules prompt inappropriate biopsy in autonomously functioning thyroid nodules.
    Castellana M; Virili C; Paone G; Scappaticcio L; Piccardo A; Giovanella L; Trimboli P
    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2020 Jul; 93(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 32319108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Thyroid Risk Categorization Systems and Fine-Needle Aspiration Recommendations in a Multi-Institutional Thyroid Ultrasound Registry.
    Hoang JK; Middleton WD; Langer JE; Schmidt K; Gillis LB; Nair SS; Watts JA; Snyder RW; Khot R; Rawal U; Tessler FN
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2021 Dec; 18(12):1605-1613. PubMed ID: 34419476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Follow-Up Strategies for Thyroid Nodules with Benign Cytology on Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: Malignancy Rates of Management Guidelines Using Ultrasound Before and After the Era of the Bethesda System.
    Yoon JH; Lee HS; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Park VY; Kwak JY
    Thyroid; 2019 Sep; 29(9):1227-1236. PubMed ID: 31359839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison and preliminary discussion of the reasons for the differences in diagnostic performance and unnecessary FNA biopsies between the ACR TIRADS and 2015 ATA guidelines.
    Wu XL; Du JR; Wang H; Jin CX; Sui GQ; Yang DY; Lin YQ; Luo Q; Fu P; Li HQ; Teng DK
    Endocrine; 2019 Jul; 65(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 30830584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Nodule Risk Stratification Systems: Comparison of ACR-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, K-TIRADS, and ATA Guidelines.
    Yucel S; Balci IG; Tomak L
    Ultrasound Q; 2023 Dec; 39(4):206-211. PubMed ID: 37918114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for thyroid malignancy with three international guidelines.
    Ha EJ; Shin JH; Na DG; Jung SL; Lee YH; Paik W; Hong MJ; Kim YK; Lee CY
    Ultrasonography; 2021 Oct; 40(4):594-601. PubMed ID: 34044490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An International Survey on Utilization of Five Thyroid Nodule Risk Stratification Systems: A Needs Assessment with Future Implications.
    Hoang JK; Asadollahi S; Durante C; Hegedüs L; Papini E; Tessler FN
    Thyroid; 2022 Jun; 32(6):675-681. PubMed ID: 35229624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the American Thyroid Association, K-Tirads, and Acr-Tirads Ultrasound Classification Systems Be Used to Predict Malignancy in Bethesda Category IV Nodules?
    Yang W; Fananapazir G; LaRoy J; Wilson M; Campbell MJ
    Endocr Pract; 2020 Sep; 26(9):945-952. PubMed ID: 33471698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of 5 Thyroid Ultrasound Stratification Systems for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Nodules and to Avoid Biopsy Using Histology as Reference Standard.
    Kuru B; Kefeli M; Danaci M
    Endocr Pract; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 33930581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.