147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33503401)
1. Research governance authorisation: the next frontier.
Hollingworth S; Mckavanagh D; McPherson I; Walpole E; Yu SY
Aust Health Rev; 2021 Jun; 45(3):389-392. PubMed ID: 33503401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Challenges in obtaining research ethics and governance approvals for an Australian national intersector, multisite audit study.
Buck K; Nolte L; Kelly H; Detering K; Sinclair C; White BP; Sellars M
Aust Health Rev; 2020 Sep; 44(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 32943137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Research governance as a facilitator for ethical and timely research? Learning from the experience of a large government-funded multisite research project.
Smith-Merry JL; Walton MM
Aust Health Rev; 2014 Jun; 38(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 24870355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-centre ethics and research governance review can impede non-interventional clinical research.
Duplancic C; Crough T; Bell SC;
Intern Med J; 2019 Jun; 49(6):722-728. PubMed ID: 30417974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Governance approval for multisite, non-interventional research: what can Harmonisation of Multi-Centre Ethical Review learn from the New South Wales experience?
Vajdic CM; Meagher NS; Hicks SC; Faedo M; Ward RL; Pearson SA
Intern Med J; 2012 Feb; 42(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 21241439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inconsistencies and time delays in site-specific research approvals hinder collaborative clinical research in Australia.
White VM; Bibby H; Green M; Anazodo A; Nicholls W; Pinkerton R; Phillips M; Harrup R; Osborn M; Orme LM; Conyers R; Thompson K; Coory M
Intern Med J; 2016 Sep; 46(9):1023-9. PubMed ID: 27396473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS.
Vaughan G; Pollock W; Peek MJ; Knight M; Ellwood D; Homer CS; Pulver LJ; McLintock C; Ho MT; Sullivan EA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 52(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 22188386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethics and governance for a multi-site study in Australia: Navigating the snakes and ladders.
Samir N; Amarasena L; Sealy L; Hodgins M; Gelaw Y; Lingam R; Zwi K
J Paediatr Child Health; 2022 Jan; 58(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 34529302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical trials with cannabis medicines-guidance for ethics committees, governance officers and researchers to streamline ethics applications and ensuring patient safety: considerations from the Australian experience.
Martin JH; Hill C; Walsh A; Efron D; Taylor K; Kennedy M; Galettis R; Lightfoot P; Hanson J; Irving H; Agar M; Lacey J
Trials; 2020 Nov; 21(1):932. PubMed ID: 33203469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One stop or full stop? The continuing challenges for researchers despite the new streamlined NHS research governance process.
Thompson AG; France EF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 May; 10():124. PubMed ID: 20465819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing the time to ethics and governance approvals for clinical trials: a retrospective cross-sectional survey.
Crosby S; Malavisi A; Huang L; Jan S; Holden R; Neal B
Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):779. PubMed ID: 38041126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
Carter YH; Shaw S; Macfarlane F
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 2002 Feb; (81):iii-vi, 1-72. PubMed ID: 12049028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Department of Health's research governance framework remains an impediment to multi-centre studies: findings from a national descriptive study.
Kielmann T; Tierney A; Porteous R; Huby G; Sheikh A; Pinnock H
J R Soc Med; 2007 May; 100(5):234-8. PubMed ID: 17470931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Heterogeneity of Human Research Ethics Committees and Research Governance Offices across Australia: An observational study.
De Smit E; Kearns LS; Clarke L; Dick J; Hill CL; Hewitt AW
Australas Med J; 2016; 9(2):33-9. PubMed ID: 26989449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-centre research in Australia: analysis of a recent National Health and Medical Research Council-funded project.
Kidd TJ; Marks GB; Bye PT; Wainwright CE; Robinson PJ; Rose BR; Harbour C; Bell SC;
Respirology; 2009 Sep; 14(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 19740265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation in Human Research Ethics Committee and governance processes throughout Australia: a need for a uniform approach.
Dudi-Venkata NN; Cox DRA; Marson N; Tan L; Pockney P; Muralidharan V; Watson DI; Richards T;
ANZ J Surg; 2021 Nov; 91(11):2263-2268. PubMed ID: 33851489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.
Petrova M; Barclay S
BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 30678668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Applying for ethical approval for research: the main issues.
Gelling L
Nurs Stand; 2016 Jan; 30(20):40-4. PubMed ID: 26758167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Out of the frying pan? Streamlining the ethics review process of multisite qualitative research projects.
Iedema RA; Allen S; Britton K; Hor S
Aust Health Rev; 2013 May; 37(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 23257167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
