These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33503659)

  • 1. Quality of Literature Searches Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Review of Reviews.
    O'Donohoe TJ; Bridson TL; Shafik CG; Wynne D; Dhillon RS; Tee JW
    Neurosurgery; 2021 Apr; 88(5):891-899. PubMed ID: 33503659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Research on Research Study.
    O'Donohoe TJ; Dhillon R; Bridson TL; Tee J
    Neurosurgery; 2019 Jul; 85(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30649511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language.
    Cao L; Yao L; Hui X; Li J; Zhang X; Li M; Feng Z; Ren M; Xian K; Sun Y; Liu Y; Luo X; Chen Y; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 140():178-188. PubMed ID: 34418547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.
    Martinez-Monedero R; Danielian A; Angajala V; Dinalo JE; Kezirian EJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Nov; 163(5):892-905. PubMed ID: 32450783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.
    Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136540. PubMed ID: 26317406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines.
    Toews LC
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2017 Jul; 105(3):233-239. PubMed ID: 28670210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery.
    Javidan A; Alaichi J; Nassar Y; Li A; Balta KY; Naji F
    J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.
    Page MJ; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):263. PubMed ID: 29258593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review search methods evaluated using the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews tool.
    de Kock S; Stirk L; Ross J; Duffy S; Noake C; Misso K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Dec; 37():e18. PubMed ID: 33280626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews of nursing published in the Cochrane Library and paper-based journals.
    Zhang J; Han L; Shields L; Tian J; Wang J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Dec; 98(49):e18099. PubMed ID: 31804319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics.
    Fleming PS; Seehra J; Polychronopoulou A; Fedorowicz Z; Pandis N
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jan; 83(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 22720835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in "evidence-based" Chinese journals.
    Li JL; Ge L; Ma JC; Zeng QL; Yao L; An N; Ding JX; Gan YH; Tian JH
    Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; 3():58. PubMed ID: 24906805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
    Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good quality.
    Sharma S; Oremus M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():123-131. PubMed ID: 29654821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.