These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33504770)

  • 1. TALEN outperforms Cas9 in editing heterochromatin target sites.
    Jain S; Shukla S; Yang C; Zhang M; Fatma Z; Lingamaneni M; Abesteh S; Lane ST; Xiong X; Wang Y; Schroeder CM; Selvin PR; Zhao H
    Nat Commun; 2021 Jan; 12(1):606. PubMed ID: 33504770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Single-Molecule View of Genome Editing Proteins: Biophysical Mechanisms for TALEs and CRISPR/Cas9.
    Cuculis L; Schroeder CM
    Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2017 Jun; 8():577-597. PubMed ID: 28489428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of gene editing efficiencies of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN for generation of MSTN knock-out cashmere goats.
    Zhang J; Liu J; Yang W; Cui M; Dai B; Dong Y; Yang J; Zhang X; Liu D; Liang H; Cang M
    Theriogenology; 2019 Jul; 132():1-11. PubMed ID: 30981084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gene Editing With TALEN and CRISPR/Cas in Rice.
    Bi H; Yang B
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2017; 149():81-98. PubMed ID: 28712502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chromatin context-dependent effects of epigenetic drugs on CRISPR-Cas9 editing.
    Schep R; Trauernicht M; Vergara X; Friskes A; Morris B; Gregoricchio S; Manzo SG; Zwart W; Beijersbergen RL; Medema RH; van Steensel B
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2024 Aug; 52(15):8815-8832. PubMed ID: 38953163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recruitment of DNA Repair MRN Complex by Intrinsically Disordered Protein Domain Fused to Cas9 Improves Efficiency of CRISPR-Mediated Genome Editing.
    Reuven N; Adler J; Broennimann K; Myers N; Shaul Y
    Biomolecules; 2019 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 31597252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A highly efficient method for enriching TALEN or CRISPR/Cas9-edited mutant cells.
    Yasuda H; Kim E; Reza AM; Kim JH
    J Genet Genomics; 2016 Dec; 43(12):705-708. PubMed ID: 27916442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genome Editing of Silkworms.
    Tsubota T; Sezutsu H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1630():205-218. PubMed ID: 28643261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulating chromatin accessibility by transactivation and targeting proximal dsgRNAs enhances Cas9 editing efficiency in vivo.
    Liu G; Yin K; Zhang Q; Gao C; Qiu JL
    Genome Biol; 2019 Jul; 20(1):145. PubMed ID: 31349852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New Bicistronic TALENs Greatly Improve Genome Editing.
    Martín-Fernández JM; Fleischer A; Vallejo-Diez S; Palomino E; Sánchez-Gilabert A; Ruiz R; Bejarano Y; Llinàs P; Gayá A; Bachiller D
    Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol; 2020 Mar; 52(1):e104. PubMed ID: 32023363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved Genome Editing in the Ascidian Ciona with CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN.
    Sasakura Y; Horie T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2637():375-388. PubMed ID: 36773161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Highly efficient biallelic genome editing of human ES/iPS cells using a CRISPR/Cas9 or TALEN system.
    Takayama K; Igai K; Hagihara Y; Hashimoto R; Hanawa M; Sakuma T; Tachibana M; Sakurai F; Yamamoto T; Mizuguchi H
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 May; 45(9):5198-5207. PubMed ID: 28334759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applications of Alternative Nucleases in the Age of CRISPR/Cas9.
    Guha TK; Edgell DR
    Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Nov; 18(12):. PubMed ID: 29186020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fully Automated One-Step Synthesis of Single-Transcript TALEN Pairs Using a Biological Foundry.
    Chao R; Liang J; Tasan I; Si T; Ju L; Zhao H
    ACS Synth Biol; 2017 Apr; 6(4):678-685. PubMed ID: 28103009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temperature effect on CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing.
    Xiang G; Zhang X; An C; Cheng C; Wang H
    J Genet Genomics; 2017 Apr; 44(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 28412228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic quantification of HDR and NHEJ reveals effects of locus, nuclease, and cell type on genome-editing.
    Miyaoka Y; Berman JR; Cooper SB; Mayerl SJ; Chan AH; Zhang B; Karlin-Neumann GA; Conklin BR
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():23549. PubMed ID: 27030102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genome Editing of Rat.
    Kaneko T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1630():101-108. PubMed ID: 28643253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chromatin accessibility and guide sequence secondary structure affect CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing efficiency.
    Jensen KT; Fløe L; Petersen TS; Huang J; Xu F; Bolund L; Luo Y; Lin L
    FEBS Lett; 2017 Jul; 591(13):1892-1901. PubMed ID: 28580607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A guide for drug inducible genome editing with HIT systems.
    Zhao C; Wei S; Wang Y
    Methods Enzymol; 2019; 621():53-68. PubMed ID: 31128789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Basics of genome editing technology and its application in livestock species.
    Petersen B
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2017 Aug; 52 Suppl 3():4-13. PubMed ID: 28815851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.