BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33505152)

  • 21. Ultrasound and FibroScan
    Salmi A; di Filippo L; Ferrari C; Frara S; Giustina A
    Endocrine; 2022 Nov; 78(2):262-269. PubMed ID: 35980569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter (UGAP) for the quantification of liver steatosis using the Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) as the reference method.
    Bende F; Sporea I; Șirli R; Bâldea V; Lazăr A; Lupușoru R; Fofiu R; Popescu A
    Med Ultrason; 2021 Feb; 23(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 33220028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of hepatic steatosis by controlled attenuation parameter using the M and XL probes: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Petroff D; Blank V; Newsome PN; Shalimar ; Voican CS; Thiele M; de Lédinghen V; Baumeler S; Chan WK; Perlemuter G; Cardoso AC; Aggarwal S; Sasso M; Eddowes PJ; Allison M; Tsochatzis E; Anstee QM; Sheridan D; Cobbold JF; Naveau S; Lupsor-Platon M; Mueller S; Krag A; Irles-Depe M; Semela D; Wong GL; Wong VW; Villela-Nogueira CA; Garg H; Chazouillères O; Wiegand J; Karlas T
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Mar; 6(3):185-198. PubMed ID: 33460567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter as a noninvasive test for steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
    Kuroda H; Abe T; Fujiwara Y; Nagasawa T; Takikawa Y
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Oct; 48(4):471-480. PubMed ID: 34415481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Controlled attenuation parameter for noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis using Fibroscan®: validation in chronic hepatitis B.
    Mi YQ; Shi QY; Xu L; Shi RF; Liu YG; Li P; Shen F; Lu W; Fan JG
    Dig Dis Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):243-51. PubMed ID: 25194851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for assessing steatosis and fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cao YT; Xiang LL; Qi F; Zhang YJ; Chen Y; Zhou XQ
    EClinicalMedicine; 2022 Sep; 51():101547. PubMed ID: 35844772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic Performance of FibroTouch Ultrasound Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurement in Assessing Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Qu Y; Song YY; Chen CW; Fu QC; Shi JP; Xu Y; Xie Q; Yang YF; Zhou YJ; Li LP; Xu MY; Cai XB; Zhang QD; Yu H; Fan JG; Lu LG
    Clin Transl Gastroenterol; 2021 Apr; 12(4):e00323. PubMed ID: 33848277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative study of ultrasound attenuation analysis and controlled attenuation parameter in the diagnosis and grading of liver steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients.
    Wang M; Tang S; Li G; Huang Z; Mo S; Yang K; Chen J; Du B; Xu J; Ding Z; Dong F
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):81. PubMed ID: 38395765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Volumetric Liver Fat Fraction Determines Grade of Steatosis More Accurately Than Controlled Attenuation Parameter in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Harry S; Lai LL; Nik Mustapha NR; Abdul Aziz YF; Vijayananthan A; Rahmat K; Mahadeva S; Chan WK
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Apr; 18(4):945-953.e2. PubMed ID: 31442603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance of Controlled Attenuation Parameter in Patients with Advanced Chronic Liver Disease and Portal Hypertension.
    Semmler G; Stift J; Scheiner B; Wöran K; Schwabl P; Paternostro R; Bucsics T; Stättermayer AF; Pinter M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Reiberger T; Mandorfer M
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3642-3651. PubMed ID: 31209721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and transient elastography in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
    Gu Q; Cen L; Lai J; Zhang Z; Pan J; Zhao F; Yu C; Li Y; Chen C; Chen W; Shen Z
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2021 Feb; 51(2):e13446. PubMed ID: 33128454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prospective comparison of transient elastography, MRI and serum scores for grading steatosis and detecting non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in bariatric surgery candidates.
    Garteiser P; Castera L; Coupaye M; Doblas S; Calabrese D; Dioguardi Burgio M; Ledoux S; Bedossa P; Esposito-Farèse M; Msika S; Van Beers BE; Jouët P
    JHEP Rep; 2021 Dec; 3(6):100381. PubMed ID: 34786549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnostic value of controlled attenuation parameter for liver steatosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
    Wang CY; Lu W; Hu DS; Wang GD; Cheng XJ
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 20(30):10585-90. PubMed ID: 25132779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detection of hepatic steatosis using the controlled attenuation parameter: a comparative study with liver biopsy.
    Yilmaz Y; Yesil A; Gerin F; Ergelen R; Akin H; Celikel ÇA; Imeryuz N
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 May; 49(5):611-6. PubMed ID: 24611771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of Liver-Related Events With a Combination of Liver Stiffness Measurements and Controlled Attenuation Parameters in Japanese Patients With Biopsy-Proven Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Hayashi H; Kamada Y; Fujii H; Takahashi H; Oeda S; Iwaki M; Kawaguchi T; Tomita E; Yoneda M; Tokushige A; Ueda S; Aishima S; Sumida Y; Nakajima A; Okanoue T;
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1658-1664. PubMed ID: 37120329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of FibroTouch in assessing liver steatosis and fibrosis in patients with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Yu H; Liu H; Zhang J; Jia G; Yang L; Zhang Q; Li G; Liu F; Di F; Wang F
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Sep; 10(9):9702-9714. PubMed ID: 34628896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of liver stiffness measurement and controlled attenuation parameter using FibroScan
    Oeda S; Takahashi H; Imajo K; Seko Y; Ogawa Y; Moriguchi M; Yoneda M; Anzai K; Aishima S; Kage M; Itoh Y; Nakajima A; Eguchi Y
    J Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 55(4):428-440. PubMed ID: 31654131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Body mass index-based controlled attenuation parameter cut-offs for assessment of hepatic steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
    Shalimar ; Kumar R; Rout G; Kumar R; Yadav R; Das P; Aggarwal S; Gunjan D; Saraya A; Nayak B
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2020 Feb; 39(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 32185692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationship between Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Hepatic Steatosis as Assessed by Ultrasound in Alcoholic or Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Ahn JM; Paik YH; Min SY; Cho JY; Sohn W; Sinn DH; Gwak GY; Choi MS; Lee JH; Koh KC; Paik SW; Yoo BC
    Gut Liver; 2016 Mar; 10(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 26347511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hepatic steatosis leads to overestimation of liver stiffness measurement in both chronic hepatitis B and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease patients.
    Liu J; Ma Y; Han P; Wang J; Liu YG; Shi RF; Li J
    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2022 Oct; 46(8):101957. PubMed ID: 35609821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.