These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Voluntary review of obstetric and gynecologic services. Gibbs CE; Cheetham PS QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1988 Sep; 14(9):290-3. PubMed ID: 3148881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of the perinatal committee. Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Oct; 56(10):42. PubMed ID: 488563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Standards in obstetrics and gynecology studied in the light of recent legislation]. Damiani N Minerva Med; 1979 Dec; 70(55):3757-61. PubMed ID: 523005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Board recommends obstetrics and anesthesia indicators for hospital consideration. Jt Comm Perspect; 1990; 10(1):1, 4-5. PubMed ID: 10120666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Voluntary review of quality of care peer review for patient safety. Stumpf PG Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):557-64. PubMed ID: 17468051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Keeping the record straight: guidelines for charting (Part II-Obstetrical documentation). Professional Liability Program, Farmers Insurance Group of Companies. QRC Advis; 1990 Feb; 6(4):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 10103489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New guidelines help hospitals monitor ob/gyn care. Koska MT Hospitals; 1989 Aug; 63(16):52. PubMed ID: 2759596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The tragic necessity of treating infants with AIDS. Urteaga JN Tex Hosp; 1988 Apr; 43(11):33-4. PubMed ID: 10286969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal monitors: hospitals continue use despite adverse reports. Stoltz MK Health Care Week; 1979 Jan; 2(28):1, 3. PubMed ID: 10323983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An independent obstetric review: Te Kuiti Hospital 1971-80. Lawrenson RA N Z Med J; 1982 Apr; 95(706):279-81. PubMed ID: 6953374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When one and one aren't two. Janatpour D QRC Advis; 1989 Mar; 5(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 10293938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reconciling high-tech with high-touch. Health Care Strateg Manage; 1985 Feb; 3(2):32-4. PubMed ID: 10270154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review in obstetrics and gynecology by a national medical specialty society. Gluck PA; Scarrow PK Jt Comm J Qual Saf; 2003 Feb; 29(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 12616922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of medical staff departments in peer review. Dimond FC QRC Advis; 1992 Jun; 8(8):6-8. PubMed ID: 10119299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Council on scientific affairs report C medical care for indigent and culturally displaced obstetrical patients and their newborns. J Tenn Med Assoc; 1981 Apr; 74(4):255-6. PubMed ID: 7253644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Maternity service in a general hospital. Part 1: Obstetrical data. de Muylder X Cent Afr J Med; 1986 Oct; 32(10):240-3. PubMed ID: 3652183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Chicago maternity units may be cut. Holcomb B Health Care Week; 1978 Sep; 2(11):8. PubMed ID: 10237663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]