These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33505323)

  • 21. A realistic approach to assessing mental health laws' compliance with the UNCRPD.
    Dawson J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 40():70-9. PubMed ID: 25982965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Supported decision making for people with mental health disorders in clinical practice: a systematic review.
    Penzenstadler L; Molodynski A; Khazaal Y
    Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract; 2020 Mar; 24(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 31613166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Key, Not a Straitjacket: The Case for Interim Mental Health Legislation Pending Complete Prohibition of Psychiatric Coercion in Accordance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    Davidson L
    Health Hum Rights; 2020 Jun; 22(1):163-178. PubMed ID: 32669798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Situating dementia in the experience of old age: Reconstructing legal response.
    Hall MI
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101468. PubMed ID: 31706378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does "supported decision-making" in India's Mental Health Care Bill, 2013, measure up to the CRPD's standards?
    Inamdar M; Stein MA; Bunders J
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2016; 1(4):229-236. PubMed ID: 27731295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Equality in the Informed Consent Process: Competence to Consent, Substitute Decision-Making, and Discrimination of Persons with Mental Disorders.
    Scholten M; Gather J; Vollmann J
    J Med Philos; 2021 Jan; 46(1):108-136. PubMed ID: 33491736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The concept of capacity in Australian mental health law reform: Going in the wrong direction?
    McSherry B; Wilson K
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 40():60-9. PubMed ID: 25958054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. From Substitute to Supported Decision Making: Practitioner, Community and Service-User Perspectives on Privileging Will and Preferences in Mental Health Care.
    Gordon S; Gardiner T; Gledhill K; Tamatea A; Newton-Howes G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(10):. PubMed ID: 35627542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An end to coercion: rights and decision-making in mental health care.
    Sugiura K; Mahomed F; Saxena S; Patel V
    Bull World Health Organ; 2020 Jan; 98(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 31902962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Supporting decision-making of adults with cognitive disabilities: The role of Law Reform Agencies - Recommendations, rationales and influence.
    Then SN; Carney T; Bigby C; Douglas J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 61():64-75. PubMed ID: 30245192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A new tool to assess compliance of mental health laws with the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.
    Byrne M; White B; McDonald F
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 58():122-142. PubMed ID: 29853003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rights, laws and tensions: A comparative analysis of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the WHO Resource Book on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation.
    Duffy RM; Kelly BD
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 54():26-35. PubMed ID: 28962684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Best interests, benefit, will and preference: The influence of international human rights and external actors on decision-making frameworks in the United Kingdom and Ireland.
    Finnerty AM; Laing J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101841. PubMed ID: 36351357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The influence of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on the German jurisdiction and legalisation regarding compulsory measures].
    Müller S
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2018 Aug; 86(8):485-492. PubMed ID: 30125919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Testing Equality: Insanity, Treatment Refusal and the CRPD.
    Wondemaghen M
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(2):174-185. PubMed ID: 31984014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Key components of supporting and assessing decision making ability.
    Webb P; Davidson G; Edge R; Falls D; Keenan F; Kelly B; McLaughlin A; Montgomery L; Mulvenna C; Norris B; Owens A; Shea Irvine R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 72():101613. PubMed ID: 32889426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Supported decision-making and personal autonomy for persons with intellectual disabilities: article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.
    Devi N
    J Law Med Ethics; 2013; 41(4):792-806, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 24446938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Abolition or Reform of Mental Health Law: How Should the Law Recognise and Respond to the Vulnerability of Persons with Mental Impairment?
    Wilson KE
    Med Law Rev; 2020 Feb; 28(1):30-64. PubMed ID: 30977825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Legal capacity under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    McSherry B
    J Law Med; 2012 Sep; 20(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23156644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Participation and service access rights for people with intellectual disability: a role for law?
    Carney T
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2013 Mar; 38(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 23164093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.