247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33506317)
1. The Budget Impact of Monoclonal Antibodies Used to Treat Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Minas Gerais, Brazil.
da Silva WC; Godman B; de Assis Acúrcio F; Cherchiglia ML; Martin A; Maruszczyk K; Izidoro JB; Portella MA; Lana AP; Campos Neto OH; Andrade EIG
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2021 Jul; 19(4):557-577. PubMed ID: 33506317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic Evaluation of Monoclonal Antibodies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Koilakou S; Petrou P
Mol Diagn Ther; 2021 Nov; 25(6):715-734. PubMed ID: 34816395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, and Panitumumab) in Combination with Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
da Silva WC; de Araujo VE; Lima EMEA; Dos Santos JBR; Silva MRRD; Almeida PHRF; de Assis Acurcio F; Godman B; Kurdi A; Cherchiglia ML; Andrade EIG
BioDrugs; 2018 Dec; 32(6):585-606. PubMed ID: 30499082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab and panitumumab for chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Carvalho AC; Leal F; Sasse AD
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175409. PubMed ID: 28403233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies Associated With Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Barufaldi LA; de Albuquerque RCR; do Nascimento A; Martins LFL; Zimmermann IR; de Souza MC
Value Health Reg Issues; 2023 Sep; 37():33-40. PubMed ID: 37207532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Lange A; Prenzler A; Frank M; Kirstein M; Vogel A; von der Schulenburg JM
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 24011538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy.
Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG
Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Cetuximab and Panitumumab in the 1st Line Treatment of mCRC in Real Clinical Practice in the Czech Republic.
Sehnalová I; Říhová B; Němeček R; Kintrová K; Demlová R
Klin Onkol; 2019; 32(4):288-293. PubMed ID: 31426645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review.
Tol J; Punt CJ
Clin Ther; 2010 Mar; 32(3):437-53. PubMed ID: 20399983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Shi Y; Wan X; Tan C; Li J; Peng L
Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):847-859. PubMed ID: 31902066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative net cost impact of the utilization of panitumumab versus cetuximab for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada.
Pettigrew M; Kavan P; Surprenant L; Lim HJ
J Med Econ; 2016; 19(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 26442575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-minimization analysis of panitumumab compared with cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Fakih MG; Knox HN; Maglinte GA; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Schwartzberg LS
J Med Econ; 2015; 18(8):619-28. PubMed ID: 25822327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. NICE guidance on cetuximab, bevacizumab, and panitumumab for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy.
Rinaldi F; George E; Adler AI
Lancet Oncol; 2012 Mar; 13(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 22489288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
