140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3350650)
1. From Quinlan to Jobes: the courts and the PVS patient.
Armstrong PW; Colen BD
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 3350650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The lessons of Quinlan.
Drane JF
Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):19-23. PubMed ID: 10277355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Food and water can be withheld from dying patients: the very different situations of Claire Conroy and Karen Quinlan.
Lynn J
Death Educ; 1984; 8(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 10310838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical discrimination against children with disabilities: a report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Shapiro RS
Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 2149131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. When is medical treatment "futile"?
Bennett AJ
Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8354625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In the matter of Nancy Ellen Jobes.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 3638288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death.
Merritt TL
Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the continued provision of food and fluids in Nancy Cruzan's best interests?
Harris CE; Bostrom BA
Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):415-35. PubMed ID: 2108099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What criteria should guide decision makers for incompetent patients?
Emanuel EJ
Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8578):170-1. PubMed ID: 2892998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Natural death: an alternative in New Jersey.
Levant S
Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1331-54. PubMed ID: 11651811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Nutrition and hydration as elective therapy: Brophy and Jobes from an ethical and historical perspective.
Derr PG
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 3091528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates.
Gostin L
Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The courts and the PVS patient.
Armstrong PW; Colen BD
N J Med; 1989 Jan; 86(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 2915821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
Hyland WF; Baime DS
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Refusing treatment for incompetent patients; why Quinlan and Saikewicz cases agree on roles of guardians, physicians, judges, and ethics committees.
Annas GJ
N Y State J Med; 1980 Apr; 80(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 6930563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Quinlan case: death decision by committee.
Annas GJ
New Physician; 1979 Feb; 28(2):53-4, 56. PubMed ID: 10240660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical ethics after Quinlan: guidelines and the ethics of dying.
Hudson RP
J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 83(7):371-5, 340. PubMed ID: 7119537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of the Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in the Claire Conroy case.
Nevins MA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1986 Feb; 34(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 3944404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Futile care. Physicians should not be allowed to refuse to treat. Point.
Veatch RM; Spicer CM
Health Prog; 1993 Dec; 74(10):22-7. PubMed ID: 10130086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
