These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33508029)

  • 1. Morphosyntactic but not lexical corpus-based probabilities can substitute for cloze probabilities in reading experiments.
    Lopukhina A; Lopukhin K; Laurinavichyute A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0246133. PubMed ID: 33508029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Limits on lexical prediction during reading.
    Luke SG; Christianson K
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Aug; 88():22-60. PubMed ID: 27376659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictability.
    Hofmann MJ; Remus S; Biemann C; Radach R; Kuchinke L
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():730570. PubMed ID: 35187472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictability and novelty in literal language comprehension: an ERP study.
    Davenport T; Coulson S
    Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 1418():70-82. PubMed ID: 21925647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction.
    Lowder MW; Choi W; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1166-1183. PubMed ID: 29442360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linguistic networks associated with lexical, semantic and syntactic predictability in reading: A fixation-related fMRI study.
    Carter BT; Foster B; Muncy NM; Luke SG
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():224-240. PubMed ID: 30654173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cloze probability, predictability ratings, and computational estimates for 205 English sentences, aligned with existing EEG and reading time data.
    de Varda AG; Marelli M; Amenta S
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37880511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discourse coherence modulates use of predictive processing during sentence comprehension.
    Carter GA; Hoffman P
    Cognition; 2024 Jan; 242():105637. PubMed ID: 37857052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG.
    Kretzschmar F; Schlesewsky M; Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1648-62. PubMed ID: 26010829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring local context as context-word probabilities.
    Hahn LW
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):344-60. PubMed ID: 21960060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information entropy facilitates (not impedes) lexical processing during language comprehension.
    Karimi H; Weber P; Zinn J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38361106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Provo Corpus: A large eye-tracking corpus with predictability norms.
    Luke SG; Christianson K
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):826-833. PubMed ID: 28523601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human and computer estimations of Predictability of words in written language.
    Bianchi B; Bengolea Monzón G; Ferrer L; Fernández Slezak D; Shalom DE; Kamienkowski JE
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4396. PubMed ID: 32157161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension.
    Brothers T; Kuperberg GR
    J Mem Lang; 2021 Feb; 116():. PubMed ID: 33100508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Word Frequency and Predictability Dissociate in Naturalistic Reading.
    Shain C
    Open Mind (Camb); 2024; 8():177-201. PubMed ID: 38476662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric asymmetry in interpreting novel literal language: an event-related potential study.
    Davenport T; Coulson S
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Apr; 51(5):907-21. PubMed ID: 23376053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of reading comprehension and launch site on frequency-predictability interactions during paragraph reading.
    Whitford V; Titone D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1151-65. PubMed ID: 24205888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences.
    Vissers CTWM; Chwilla DJ; Kolk HHJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1106(1):150-163. PubMed ID: 16843443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of context on processing words during sentence reading among adults varying in age and literacy skill.
    Steen-Baker AA; Ng S; Payne BR; Anderson CJ; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EAL
    Psychol Aging; 2017 Aug; 32(5):460-472. PubMed ID: 28816473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.