These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33508410)

  • 1. Test-retest reliability of paired pulse suppression paradigm using auditory change-related response.
    Takeuchi N; Fujita K; Kinukawa T; Sugiyama S; Kanemoto K; Nishihara M; Inui K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2021 Mar; 352():109087. PubMed ID: 33508410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test-retest reliability of prepulse inhibition paradigm using auditory evoked potentials.
    Takeuchi N; Kinukawa T; Sugiyama S; Inui K; Nishihara M
    Neurosci Res; 2021 Sep; 170():187-194. PubMed ID: 32987086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest reliability of P50, N100 and P200 auditory sensory gating in healthy subjects.
    Rentzsch J; Jockers-Scherübl MC; Boutros NN; Gallinat J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Feb; 67(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 18053603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Range of sensory gating values and test-retest reliability in normal subjects.
    Fuerst DR; Gallinat J; Boutros NN
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jul; 44(4):620-6. PubMed ID: 17437554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New paradigm for auditory paired pulse suppression.
    Takeuchi N; Sugiyama S; Inui K; Kanemoto K; Nishihara M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177747. PubMed ID: 28542290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship of loudness-dependent auditory evoked potentials with change-related cortical responses.
    Fujita K; Takeuchi N; Sugiyama S; Inui K; Fujita Y; Yamaba A; Kamiya T; Kanemoto K; Nishihara M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277153. PubMed ID: 36342917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-latency suppression of auditory and somatosensory change-related cortical responses.
    Takeuchi N; Sugiyama S; Inui K; Kanemoto K; Nishihara M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199614. PubMed ID: 29944700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. P50-N100-P200 sensory gating deficits in adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorders.
    Chien YL; Hsieh MH; Gau SS
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2019 Dec; 95():109683. PubMed ID: 31260720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suppression of the auditory middle-latency response and evoked gamma-band response in a paired-click paradigm.
    Müller MM; Keil A; Kissler J; Gruber T
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Feb; 136(4):474-9. PubMed ID: 11291728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanisms of Short- and Long-Latency Sensory Suppression: Magnetoencephalography Study.
    Takeuchi N; Fujita K; Taniguchi T; Kinukawa T; Sugiyama S; Kanemoto K; Nishihara M; Inui K
    Neuroscience; 2023 Mar; 514():92-99. PubMed ID: 36435478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of midlatency auditory sensory gating at short and long interstimulus intervals.
    Rentzsch J; de Castro AG; Neuhaus A; Jockers-Scherübl MC; Gallinat J
    Neuropsychobiology; 2008; 58(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 18781086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanisms of Long-Latency Paired Pulse Suppression: MEG Study.
    Takeuchi N; Fujita K; Taniguchi T; Kinukawa T; Sugiyama S; Kanemoto K; Nishihara M; Inui K
    Brain Topogr; 2022 Mar; 35(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 34748108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimuli intensity and frequency on auditory p50 and n100 sensory gating.
    Moura GS; Triñanes-Pego Y; Carrillo-de-la-Peña MT
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2010; 657():5-17. PubMed ID: 20020339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. P50, N100, and P200 Sensory Gating in Panic Disorder.
    Thoma L; Rentzsch J; Gaudlitz K; Tänzer N; Gallinat J; Kathmann N; Ströhle A; Plag J
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2020 Sep; 51(5):317-324. PubMed ID: 31914806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term habituation of the intracranially recorded auditory evoked potentials P50 and N100.
    Rosburg T; Trautner P; Korzyukov OA; Boutros NN; Schaller C; Elger CE; Kurthen M
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Dec; 372(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 15542249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory P50 obtained with a repetitive stimulus paradigm shows suppression to high-intensity tones.
    Ninomiya H; Sato E; Onitsuka T; Hayashida T; Tashiro N
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2000 Aug; 54(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 10997868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. P50 suppression in human discrimination fear conditioning paradigm using danger and safety signals.
    Kurayama T; Matsuzawa D; Komiya Z; Nakazawa K; Yoshida S; Shimizu E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Apr; 84(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 22251449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The N100 auditory cortical evoked potential indexes scanning of auditory short-term memory.
    Conley EM; Michalewski HJ; Starr A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2086-93. PubMed ID: 10616113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pre-attentive information processing and impulsivity in bipolar disorder.
    Swann AC; Lijffijt M; Lane SD; Steinberg JL; Acas MD; Cox B; Moeller FG
    J Psychiatr Res; 2013 Dec; 47(12):1917-24. PubMed ID: 24054520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impairment in Mismatch Negativity but not Repetition Suppression in Schizophrenia.
    Coffman BA; Haigh SM; Murphy TK; Salisbury DF
    Brain Topogr; 2017 Jul; 30(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28516227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.