448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33508491)
1. Can Polyether Ether Ketone Dethrone Titanium as the Choice Implant Material for Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery?
Kumar N; Ramakrishnan SA; Lopez KG; Madhu S; Ramos MRD; Fuh JYH; Hallinan J; Nolan CP; Benneker LM; Vellayappan BA
World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():94-109. PubMed ID: 33508491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolution of materials for implants in metastatic spine disease till date - Have we found an ideal material?
Kumar N; Lopez KG; Alathur Ramakrishnan S; Hallinan JTPD; Fuh JYH; Pandita N; Madhu S; Kumar A; Benneker LM; Vellayappan BA
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Oct; 163():93-104. PubMed ID: 34419506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK fixation system in the treatment of spine tumors: a preliminary report.
Boriani S; Tedesco G; Ming L; Ghermandi R; Amichetti M; Fossati P; Krengli M; Mavilla L; Gasbarrini A
Eur Spine J; 2018 Apr; 27(4):874-881. PubMed ID: 28815357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone.
Schwitalla AD; Abou-Emara M; Spintig T; Lackmann J; Müller WD
J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25435385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Surface Topography and Chemistry on Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) and Titanium Osseointegration.
Torstrick FB; Lin ASP; Safranski DL; Potter D; Sulchek T; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Apr; 45(8):E417-E424. PubMed ID: 31703050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Porous PEEK improves the bone-implant interface compared to plasma-sprayed titanium coating on PEEK.
Torstrick FB; Lin ASP; Potter D; Safranski DL; Sulchek TA; Gall K; Guldberg RE
Biomaterials; 2018 Dec; 185():106-116. PubMed ID: 30236838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interfacial shear strength of bioactive-coated carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone after in vivo implantation.
Nakahara I; Takao M; Goto T; Ohtsuki C; Hibino S; Sugano N
J Orthop Res; 2012 Oct; 30(10):1618-25. PubMed ID: 22467537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The in vivo response to a novel Ti coating compared with polyether ether ketone: evaluation of the periphery and inner surfaces of an implant.
Walsh WR; Pelletier MH; Christou C; He J; Vizesi F; Boden SD
Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1231-1240. PubMed ID: 29496625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hydroxyapatite-incorporation improves bone formation on endosseous PEEK implant in canine tibia.
Geng YM; Ren DN; Li SY; Li ZY; Shen XQ; Yuan YY
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800020975172. PubMed ID: 33307948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical, histological, and computed X-ray tomographic analyses of hydroxyapatite coated PEEK implants in an extended healing model in rabbit.
Johansson P; Barkarmo S; Hawthan M; Peruzzi N; Kjellin P; Wennerberg A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2018 May; 106(5):1440-1447. PubMed ID: 29341426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polyether ether ketone implants achieve increased bone fusion when coated with nano-sized hydroxyapatite: a histomorphometric study in rabbit bone.
Johansson P; Jimbo R; Naito Y; Kjellin P; Currie F; Wennerberg A
Int J Nanomedicine; 2016; 11():1435-42. PubMed ID: 27103801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion.
Wu SH; Li Y; Zhang YQ; Li XK; Yuan CF; Hao YL; Zhang ZY; Guo Z
Artif Organs; 2013 Dec; 37(12):E191-201. PubMed ID: 24147953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impaction durability of porous polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and titanium-coated PEEK interbody fusion devices.
Torstrick FB; Klosterhoff BS; Westerlund LE; Foley KT; Gochuico J; Lee CSD; Gall K; Safranski DL
Spine J; 2018 May; 18(5):857-865. PubMed ID: 29366985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carbon fiber reinforced vs titanium implants for fixation in spinal metastases: A comparative clinical study about safety and effectiveness of the new "carbon-strategy".
Cofano F; Di Perna G; Monticelli M; Marengo N; Ajello M; Mammi M; Vercelli G; Petrone S; Tartara F; Zenga F; Lanotte M; Garbossa D
J Clin Neurosci; 2020 May; 75():106-111. PubMed ID: 32173153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical properties and in vivo study of modified-hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone biocomposites.
Ma R; Li Q; Wang L; Zhang X; Fang L; Luo Z; Xue B; Ma L
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Apr; 73():429-439. PubMed ID: 28183629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancement of surface bioactivity on carbon fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone via graphene modification.
Yan JH; Wang CH; Li KW; Zhang Q; Yang M; Di-Wu WL; Yan M; Song Y; Ba JJ; Bi L; Han YS
Int J Nanomedicine; 2018; 13():3425-3440. PubMed ID: 29942128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of printing path and material components on mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone/hydroxyapatite composites.
Zheng J; Kang J; Sun C; Yang C; Wang L; Li D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jun; 118():104475. PubMed ID: 33773239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK spinal implants for primary and metastatic spine tumors: a systematic review on implant complications and radiotherapy benefits.
Khan HA; Ber R; Neifert SN; Kurland DB; Laufer I; Kondziolka D; Chhabra A; Frempong-Boadu AK; Lau D
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Oct; 39(4):534-547. PubMed ID: 37382293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical properties, hemocompatibility, cytotoxicity and systemic toxicity of carbon fibers/poly(ether-ether-ketone) composites with different fiber lengths as orthopedic implants.
Li Y; Wang D; Qin W; Jia H; Wu Y; Ma J; Tang B
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2019 Dec; 30(18):1709-1724. PubMed ID: 31464157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
