182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33508626)
1. Dental measurements based on a three-dimensional digital technique: A comparative study on reliability and validity.
Liu J; Liu Y; Wang J; Zuo X; Wang X; Zhang Y; He H
Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Apr; 124():105059. PubMed ID: 33508626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability, reproducibility and validity of the conventional buccolingual and mesiodistal measurements on 3D dental digital models obtained from intra-oral 3D scanner.
Soto-Álvarez C; Fonseca GM; Viciano J; Alemán I; Rojas-Torres J; Zúñiga MH; López-Lázaro S
Arch Oral Biol; 2020 Jan; 109():104575. PubMed ID: 31589998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.
Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and intra-examiner agreement of orthodontic model analysis with a digital caliper on plaster and printed dental models.
Koretsi V; Kirschbauer C; Proff P; Kirschneck C
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3387-3396. PubMed ID: 30539294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra-observer reliability and agreement of manual and digital orthodontic model analysis.
Koretsi V; Tingelhoff L; Proff P; Kirschneck C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 28531341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation and agreement of a digital and conventional method to measure arch parameters.
Nawi N; Mohamed AM; Marizan Nor M; Ashar NA
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jan; 79(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 29116344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.
Hazeveld A; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-arch digital model vs. manual cast measurements: Accuracy and reliability.
Kiviahde H; Bukovac L; Jussila P; Pesonen P; Sipilä K; Raustia A; Pirttiniemi P
Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):222-227. PubMed ID: 28659050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of the buccolingual inclination of teeth: manual technique vs 3-dimensional software.
Nouri M; Abdi AH; Farzan A; Mokhtarpour F; Baghban AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 25263155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
Camardella LT; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of the trueness of linear measurements using direct and indirect scanning protocols compared to actual clinical measurements.
Abdelhafez RS; Mustafa NM; Khader YS
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Feb; 36(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 37606174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conformity, reliability and validity of digital dental models created by clinical intraoral scanning and extraoral plaster model digitization workflows.
Kirschneck C; Kamuf B; Putsch C; Chhatwani S; Bizhang M; Danesh G
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Sep; 100():114-122. PubMed ID: 29990644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
