178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33508626)
21. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models.
Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Miasiro Junior H; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO
Braz Oral Res; 2009; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19893964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Initial establishment of digital reference standardized crown models of the primary teeth].
Feng SW; Guo H; Wang Y; Zhao YJ; Liu H
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Apr; 54(2):327-334. PubMed ID: 35435200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
Burns A; Dowling AH; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of linear and angular changes assessed in digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography.
Massaro C; Losada C; Cevidanes L; Yatabe M; Garib D; Lauris JRP; Ioshida M; Rey D; Alvarez MA; Benavides E; Rios H; Aristizabal JF; Ruellas AC
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):118-128. PubMed ID: 31628885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner.
Olszewski R; Szyper-Szczurowska J; Opach M; Bednarczyk P; Zapala J; Szczepanik S
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Dec; 28(12):1647-1656. PubMed ID: 31778603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The reliability and validity of measurements of human dental casts made by an intra-oral 3D scanner, with conventional hand-held digital callipers as the comparison measure.
Rajshekar M; Julian R; Williams AM; Tennant M; Forrest A; Walsh LJ; Wilson G; Blizzard L
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():198-204. PubMed ID: 28738248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study.
Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Townsend GC
Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22866590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions.
Brown GB; Currier GF; Kadioglu O; Kierl JP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Nov; 154(5):733-739. PubMed ID: 30384944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models.
Camardella LT; Vilella OV; van Hezel MM; Breuning KH
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 28361165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis.
Akyalcin S; Dyer DJ; English JD; Sar C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Digital Models Formulated From Direct Intra-oral Scanning of Dental Arches in Comparison With Extra-oral Scanning of Poured Dental Models in Terms of Dimensional Accuracy and Reliability.
Jaber ST; Hajeer MY; Alkhouli KW; Al-Shamak RM; Darwich KMA; Aljabban O; Alam MK; Kara-Boulad JM
Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54869. PubMed ID: 38405645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Defining new dental phenotypes using 3-D image analysis to enhance discrimination and insights into biological processes.
Smith R; Zaitoun H; Coxon T; Karmo M; Kaur G; Townsend G; Harris EF; Brook A
Arch Oral Biol; 2009 Dec; 54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S118-25. PubMed ID: 18644585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Identification of a stable reference area for superimposing mandibular digital models.
An K; Jang I; Choi DS; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Cha BK
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Nov; 76(6):508-19. PubMed ID: 26250456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transrectal three-dimensional fetal volumetry and crown-rump length measurement during early gestation in mares: Intra- and inter-observer reliability and agreement.
Becsek A; Tzanidakis N; Blanco M; Bollwein H
Theriogenology; 2019 Mar; 126():266-271. PubMed ID: 30590249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models.
Kardach H; Szponar-Żurowska A; Biedziak B
J Clin Med; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
