These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33508626)

  • 61. Agreement of in vitro orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and digital models using Maestro 3D ortho studio software.
    Rafiei E; Haerian A; Fadaei Tehrani P; Shokrollahi M
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Oct; 8(5):1149-1157. PubMed ID: 35719020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The validity and reliability of an automated method of scoring dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate using the modified Huddart-Bodenham scoring system.
    Martin CB; Ma X; McIntyre GT; Wang W; Lin P; Chalmers EV; Mossey PA
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 27105652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Comparison of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by 3-dimensional printing and conventional stone models with different degrees of crowding.
    Wan Hassan WN; Yusoff Y; Mardi NA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):209-218. PubMed ID: 28024776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Are there differences between comparison methods used to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of digital models?
    Camardella LT; Breuning H; Vilella OV
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017 Feb; 22(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 28444012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study.
    Rebong RE; Stewart KT; Utreja A; Ghoneima AA
    Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 29509023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Comparison of linear transverse measures between plaster and resin printed digital models.
    Manuelli M; Huanca Ghislanzoni L; Farronato M; Martintoni A; Marcolina M; Lucchese A
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2018; 32(2 Suppl. 2):81-85. PubMed ID: 29720334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Digital models: How can dental arch form be verified chairside?
    Tavares A; Braga E; Araújo TM
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):68-73. PubMed ID: 29364382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Rating dental arch relationships and palatal morphology with the EUROCRAN index on three different formats of dental casts in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Sabelis AJ; Kuijpers MA; Nada RM; Chiu YT; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Fudalej PS
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):943-50. PubMed ID: 26462656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Permanent Maxillary Odontometrics for Sex Estimation Based on a 3-Dimensional Digital Method.
    Liu J; Liu Y; Wang J; Ge S; Zhang Y; Wang X; Du L; He H
    Med Sci Monit; 2021 Dec; 27():e933450. PubMed ID: 34934039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Root-crown ratio in permanent dentition using panoramic radiography in a selected Iranian population.
    Haghanifar S; Moudi E; Abbasi S; Bijani A; Poorsattar Bejeh Mir A; Ghasemi N
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2014 Dec; 15(4):173-9. PubMed ID: 25469356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of accuracy of mesiodistal tooth measurements made in conventional study models and digital models obtained from intraoral scan and desktop scan of study models.
    Murugesan A; Sivakumar A
    J Orthod; 2020 Jun; 47(2):149-155. PubMed ID: 32195636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Validity and reliability of a three-dimensional dental cast simulator for arch dimension measurements.
    Nouri M; Asefi S; Baghban AA; Aminian A; Shamsa M; Massudi R
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2014 Nov; 11(6):656-62. PubMed ID: 25540660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Traditional plaster casts and dental digital models: intra-examiner reliability of measurements.
    Mangiacapra R; Butti AC; Salvato A; Biagi R
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 20545091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Reliability and validity of the iSense optical scanner for measuring volume of transtibial residual limb models.
    Armitage L; Kwah LK; Kark L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Apr; 43(2):213-220. PubMed ID: 30343619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
    El-Zanaty HM; El-Beialy AR; Abou El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AR; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models.
    Reuschl RP; Heuer W; Stiesch M; Wenzel D; Dittmer MP
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 25724574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [Validity and reliability of digital diagnostic measurements on digital three-dimensional dental models].
    Wiranto MG; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Engelbrecht WP; Ren Y
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2012 Feb; 119(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 22428274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity.
    Bootvong K; Liu Z; McGrath C; Hägg U; Wong RW; Bendeus M; Yeung S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 20164126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The reliability and validity of three dimensional ultrasound volumetric measurements using an in vitro balloon and in vivo uterine model.
    Farrell T; Leslie JR; Chien PF; Agustsson P
    BJOG; 2001 Jun; 108(6):573-82. PubMed ID: 11426890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.