These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33508964)

  • 1. Measuring the Efficiency of Automation-Aided Performance in a Simulated Baggage Screening Task.
    Boskemper MM; Bartlett ML; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2022 Sep; 64(6):945-961. PubMed ID: 33508964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benchmarking Aided Decision Making in a Signal Detection Task.
    Bartlett ML; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2017 Sep; 59(6):881-900. PubMed ID: 28796974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No Effect of Cue Format on Automation Dependence in an Aided Signal Detection Task.
    Bartlett ML; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):169-190. PubMed ID: 30335518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ironic efficiency in automation-aided signal detection.
    Bartlett ML; McCarley JS
    Ergonomics; 2021 Jan; 64(1):103-112. PubMed ID: 32790530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying inefficient strategies in automation-aided signal detection.
    Tikhomirov L; Bartlett ML; Duncan-Reid J; McCarley JS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Dec; 29(4):869-886. PubMed ID: 37471033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of response bias and judgment framing on operator use of an automated aid in a target detection task.
    Rice S; McCarley JS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):320-31. PubMed ID: 21707202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmarking automation-aided performance in a forensic face matching task.
    Bartlett ML; Carragher DJ; Hancock PJB; McCarley JS
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Nov; 121():104364. PubMed ID: 39121521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age and automation interact to influence performance of a simulated luggage screening task.
    Wiegmann D; McCarley JS; Kramer AF; Wickens CD
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Aug; 77(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 16909876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Task Difficulty and Display Format on Automation Usage Strategy: A Workload Capacity Analysis.
    Yamani Y; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):527-537. PubMed ID: 29470135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automation in airport security X-ray screening of cabin baggage: Examining benefits and possible implementations of automated explosives detection.
    Hättenschwiler N; Sterchi Y; Mendes M; Schwaninger A
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Oct; 72():58-68. PubMed ID: 29885728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Workload Capacity: A Response Time-Based Measure of Automation Dependence.
    Yamani Y; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):462-71. PubMed ID: 26811351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are well-calibrated users effective users? Associations between calibration of trust and performance on an automation-aided task.
    Merritt SM; Lee D; Unnerstall JL; Huber K
    Hum Factors; 2015 Feb; 57(1):34-47. PubMed ID: 25790569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collaborative search in a mock baggage screening task.
    Enright A; McCarley JS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):716-732. PubMed ID: 30816730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human Performance Consequences of Automated Decision Aids: The Impact of Time Pressure.
    Rieger T; Manzey D
    Hum Factors; 2022 Jun; 64(4):617-634. PubMed ID: 33111557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automation reliability, human-machine system performance, and operator compliance: A study with airport security screeners supported by automated explosives detection systems for cabin baggage screening.
    Huegli D; Merks S; Schwaninger A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jul; 86():103094. PubMed ID: 32342885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding the Impact of Time Pressure and Automation Support in a Visual Search Task.
    Rieger T; Manzey D
    Hum Factors; 2024 Mar; 66(3):770-786. PubMed ID: 35770911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward Quantifying Trust Dynamics: How People Adjust Their Trust After Moment-to-Moment Interaction With Automation.
    Yang XJ; Schemanske C; Searle C
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):862-878. PubMed ID: 34459266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Team performance in networked supervisory control of unmanned air vehicles: effects of automation, working memory, and communication content.
    McKendrick R; Shaw T; de Visser E; Saqer H; Kidwell B; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):463-75. PubMed ID: 24930169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.