196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33509203)
21. Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men.
Hendriks RJ; van der Leest MMG; Israël B; Hannink G; YantiSetiasti A; Cornel EB; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Klaver OS; Sedelaar JPM; Van Criekinge W; de Jong H; Mulders PFA; Crawford ED; Veltman J; Schalken JA; Barentsz JO; van Oort IM
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Dec; 24(4):1110-1119. PubMed ID: 33941866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer.
Bul M; van den Bergh RC; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Vasarainen H; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1672-7. PubMed ID: 22928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Monocytes acquire prostate cancer specific chromatin conformations upon indirect co-culture with prostate cancer cells.
Alshaker H; Hunter E; Salter M; Ramadass A; Westra W; Winkler M; Green J; Akoulitchev A; Pchejetski D
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():990842. PubMed ID: 36059613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Urine TMPRSS2:ERG Plus PCA3 for Individualized Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment.
Tomlins SA; Day JR; Lonigro RJ; Hovelson DH; Siddiqui J; Kunju LP; Dunn RL; Meyer S; Hodge P; Groskopf J; Wei JT; Chinnaiyan AM
Eur Urol; 2016 Jul; 70(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 25985884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Outcome following active surveillance of men with screen-detected prostate cancer. Results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial.
Godtman RA; Holmberg E; Khatami A; Stranne J; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 22980443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using Genetic and Epigenetic Markers to Improve Differential Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Noninvasive Methods in Mexican Patients.
Sánchez BE; Aguayo A; Martínez B; Rodríguez F; Marmolejo M; Svyryd Y; Luna L; Muñoz LA; Jiménez MA; Sotomayor M; Vargas V F; Mutchinick OM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e867-e877. PubMed ID: 29571584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improving Clinical Risk Stratification at Diagnosis in Primary Prostate Cancer: A Prognostic Modelling Study.
Gnanapragasam VJ; Lophatananon A; Wright KA; Muir KR; Gavin A; Greenberg DC
PLoS Med; 2016 Aug; 13(8):e1002063. PubMed ID: 27483464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling.
Klein EA; Cooperberg MR; Magi-Galluzzi C; Simko JP; Falzarano SM; Maddala T; Chan JM; Li J; Cowan JE; Tsiatis AC; Cherbavaz DB; Pelham RJ; Tenggara-Hunter I; Baehner FL; Knezevic D; Febbo PG; Shak S; Kattan MW; Lee M; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):550-60. PubMed ID: 24836057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A urine-based DNA methylation assay, ProCUrE, to identify clinically significant prostate cancer.
Zhao F; Olkhov-Mitsel E; Kamdar S; Jeyapala R; Garcia J; Hurst R; Hanna MY; Mills R; Tuzova AV; O'Reilly E; Kelly S; Cooper C; ; Brewer D; Perry AS; Clark J; Fleshner N; Bapat B
Clin Epigenetics; 2018 Nov; 10(1):147. PubMed ID: 30470249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of two gene panels for prostate cancer diagnosis and patient risk stratification.
Xiao K; Guo J; Zhang X; Feng X; Zhang H; Cheng Z; Johnson H; Persson JL; Chen L
Tumour Biol; 2016 Aug; 37(8):10115-22. PubMed ID: 26820133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Racial variation in prostate needle biopsy templates directed anterior to the peripheral zone.
Feibus AH; Levy J; McCaslin IR; Doucet ME; Sholl AB; Moparty K; Thomas R; Sartor O; Silberstein JL
Urol Oncol; 2016 Aug; 34(8):336.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27155916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison Between the Four-kallikrein Panel and Prostate Health Index for Predicting Prostate Cancer.
Nordström T; Vickers A; Assel M; Lilja H; Grönberg H; Eklund M
Eur Urol; 2015 Jul; 68(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 25151013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Prognostic significance of prostate-specific antigen in defining indications for initial prostate biopsy].
Popov SV; Guseinov RG; Skryabin ON; Orlov IN; Martov AG
Urologiia; 2018 Jul; (3):92-97. PubMed ID: 30035426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prostate Cancer Detection and Prognosis: From Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) to Exosomal Biomarkers.
Filella X; Foj L
Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Oct; 17(11):. PubMed ID: 27792187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing diagnostic and prognostic performance of two-gene promoter methylation panels in tissue biopsies and urines of prostate cancer patients.
Moreira-Barbosa C; Barros-Silva D; Costa-Pinheiro P; Torres-Ferreira J; Constâncio V; Freitas R; Oliveira J; Antunes L; Henrique R; Jerónimo C
Clin Epigenetics; 2018 Oct; 10(1):132. PubMed ID: 30373654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.
van der Leest M; Israël B; Cornel EB; Zámecnik P; Schoots IG; van der Lelij H; Padhani AR; Rovers M; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Hannink G; Veltman J; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 31167748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions.
Hendriks RJ; van Oort IM; Schalken JA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Mar; 20(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 27922627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Role of Genetic Polymorphisms in the Diagnosis and Management of Prostate Cancer: An Update.
Dell'atti L; Aguiari G
Anticancer Res; 2023 Jan; 43(1):317-322. PubMed ID: 36585200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Individual prognosis at diagnosis in nonmetastatic prostate cancer: Development and external validation of the PREDICT Prostate multivariable model.
Thurtle DR; Greenberg DC; Lee LS; Huang HH; Pharoah PD; Gnanapragasam VJ
PLoS Med; 2019 Mar; 16(3):e1002758. PubMed ID: 30860997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
