143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33510959)
1. Driving With Hemianopia VII: Predicting Hazard Detection With Gaze and Head Scan Magnitude.
Swan G; Savage SW; Zhang L; Bowers AR
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 10(1):20. PubMed ID: 33510959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator.
Bowers AR; Ananyev E; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1540-8. PubMed ID: 24474265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Driving with Hemianopia V: Do Individuals with Hemianopia Spontaneously Adapt Their Gaze Scanning to Differing Hazard Detection Demands?
Alberti CF; Goldstein RB; Peli E; Bowers AR
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 6(5):11. PubMed ID: 29067219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Driving With Hemianopia X: Effects of Cross Traffic on Gaze Behaviors and Pedestrian Responses at Intersections.
Xu J; Baliutaviciute V; Swan G; Bowers AR
Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():938140. PubMed ID: 35898933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory Reminder Cues to Promote Proactive Scanning on Approach to Intersections in Drivers With Homonymous Hemianopia: Driving With Hemianopia, IX.
Xu J; Emmermann B; Bowers AR
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 140(1):75-78. PubMed ID: 34817569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Head Scanning Behavior Predicts Hazard Detection Safety Before Entering an Intersection.
Savage SW; Zhang L; Swan G; Bowers AR
Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):942-955. PubMed ID: 34435529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gaze Scanning at Street Crossings by Pedestrians With Homonymous Hemianopia With and Without Hemispatial Neglect.
Pundlik S; Tomasi M; Houston KE; Kumar A; Shivshanker P; Bowers AR; Peli E; Luo G
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2023 Nov; 64(14):26. PubMed ID: 37975848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator.
Bowers AR; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 50(11):5137-47. PubMed ID: 19608541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Driving with hemianopia: III. Detection of stationary and approaching pedestrians in a simulator.
Alberti CF; Peli E; Bowers AR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jan; 55(1):368-74. PubMed ID: 24346175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Driving simulation in the clinic: testing visual exploratory behavior in daily life activities in patients with visual field defects.
Hamel J; Kraft A; Ohl S; De Beukelaer S; Audebert HJ; Brandt SA
J Vis Exp; 2012 Sep; (67):e4427. PubMed ID: 23023223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of Perceptual-motor Training on Collision Judgments with Peripheral Prism Expanded Vision.
Houston KE; Peli E; Luo G; Bowers AR; Woods RL
Optom Vis Sci; 2022 Dec; 99(12):875-884. PubMed ID: 36594755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic processing of gaze movements to quantify gaze scanning behaviors in a driving simulator.
Swan G; Goldstein RB; Savage SW; Zhang L; Ahmadi A; Bowers AR
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Apr; 53(2):487-506. PubMed ID: 32748237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Effects of Hemianopia on Perception of Mutual Gaze.
Bowers AR; Sheldon S; Hecht H
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Nov; 96(11):860-865. PubMed ID: 31664014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemianopic and quadrantanopic field loss, eye and head movements, and driving.
Wood JM; McGwin G; Elgin J; Vaphiades MS; Braswell RA; DeCarlo DK; Kline LB; Owsley C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Mar; 52(3):1220-5. PubMed ID: 21367969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gaze patterns predicting successful collision avoidance in patients with homonymous visual field defects.
Papageorgiou E; Hardiess G; Mallot HA; Schiefer U
Vision Res; 2012 Jul; 65():25-37. PubMed ID: 22721638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.
Bronstad PM; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein R; Peli E
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 23329309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Driving with Glaucoma: Task Performance and Gaze Movements.
Kübler TC; Kasneci E; Rosenstiel W; Heister M; Aehling K; Nagel K; Schiefer U; Papageorgiou E
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 92(11):1037-46. PubMed ID: 26501733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effects of Age and Central Field Loss on Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections.
Bowers AR; Bronstad PM; Spano LP; Goldstein RB; Peli E
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2019 Sep; 8(5):14. PubMed ID: 31588377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Driving with hemianopia VIII: Effects of a vibro-tactile assistance system on safety and gaze behavior in pedestrian crossing situations.
Hölzl R; Steckhan L; Lehsing C; Savage SW; Bowers AR
Safety (Basel); 2021 Mar; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 34765674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opportunities and Limitations of a Gaze-Contingent Display to Simulate Visual Field Loss in Driving Simulator Studies.
Biebl B; Arcidiacono E; Kacianka S; Rieger JW; Bengler K
Front Neuroergon; 2022; 3():916169. PubMed ID: 38235462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
