These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3351123)

  • 1. Comparison of electrophonic and auditory-nerve electroneural responses.
    Lusted HS; Simmons FB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Feb; 83(2):657-61. PubMed ID: 3351123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.
    Shepherd RK; Javel E
    Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):112-44. PubMed ID: 9213127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses.
    Sato M; Baumhoff P; Kral A
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 26740649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of electrical and acoustical stimulation of the cat ear.
    Simmons FB; Glattke TJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1972 Oct; 81(5):731-7. PubMed ID: 4651115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Information processing in the inferior colliculus of cat using high frequency acoustical stimulation and direct electrical stimulation of the osseous spiral laminae.
    Barrett TW
    Behav Biol; 1973 Aug; 9(2):189-219. PubMed ID: 4721215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response of inferior colliculus neurons to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in neonatally deafened cats.
    Shepherd RK; Baxi JH; Hardie NA
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 Sep; 82(3):1363-80. PubMed ID: 10482755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Off-responses in the auditory system in relation to the signal end phase and neuronal characteristic frequency.
    Radionova EA
    Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 35(2-3):229-35. PubMed ID: 3198512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [An approach for proper recording of the unit discharge in auditory nerve and inferior colliculus].
    Pan T; Cao KL; Wang ZZ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Oct; 23(5):481-4. PubMed ID: 12905867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural encoding of sound sensation evoked by electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve.
    Merzenich MM; Michelson RP; Pettit CR; Schindler RA; Reid M
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1973; 82(4):486-503. PubMed ID: 4721185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction of cortical evoked potentials to electric and acoustic stimuli.
    Lusted HS; Simmons FB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Aug; 76(2):449-55. PubMed ID: 6090518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the origin of the auditory averaged evoked responses recorded from the scalp in the anesthetized cat.
    Kevanishvili ZS; Kajaia OA
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1973; 76(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 4771958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of electroneural versus electrophonic stimulation on psychoacoustic electric-acoustic masking in cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
    Kipping D; Krüger B; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 395():108036. PubMed ID: 32736202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hair cell mediated responses of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the cat.
    McAnally KI; Clark GM; Syka J
    Hear Res; 1993 May; 67(1-2):55-68. PubMed ID: 8340278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Averaged evoked potentials in cats with lesions of auditory pathway.
    Goldenberg RA; Derbyshire AJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):420-9. PubMed ID: 1186151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of auditory single fiber responses during acoustic and electric stimulation of the intact cat cochlea.
    Hartmann R; Topp G; Klinke R
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1982; 234(2):187-8. PubMed ID: 7092705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural sensitivity to phase of high frequency tones.
    McAnally KI; Calford MB
    Hear Res; 1990 Feb; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 2324018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preservation of central auditory function in the deafness mouse.
    Bock GR; Frank MP; Steel KP
    Brain Res; 1982 May; 239(2):608-12. PubMed ID: 7093705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal properties of chronic cochlear electrical stimulation determine temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus.
    Vollmer M; Snyder RL; Leake PA; Beitel RE; Moore CM; Rebscher SJ
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 82(6):2883-902. PubMed ID: 10601427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus to intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of neonatal deafening and chronic stimulation.
    Snyder R; Leake P; Rebscher S; Beitel R
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Feb; 73(2):449-67. PubMed ID: 7760111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of monaural acoustic and electric stimulation: unit types in the cat inferior colliculus.
    Lithgow BJ; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():118-21. PubMed ID: 7668599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.