These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33511541)

  • 21. Cross-age comparisons reveal multiple strategies for lexical ambiguity resolution during natural reading.
    Stites MC; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1823-41. PubMed ID: 23687920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Both mOTS-words and pOTS-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a lexical judgment task.
    Dalski A; Kular H; Jorgensen JG; Grill-Spector K; Grotheer M
    Cereb Cortex; 2024 Aug; 34(8):. PubMed ID: 39191663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words.
    Schmidtke D; Van Dyke JA; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):421-439. PubMed ID: 28933895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The function/content word distinction and eye movements in reading.
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jun; 50(6):967-984. PubMed ID: 37883049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spontaneous rereading within sentences: Eye movement control and visual sampling.
    White SJ; Lantz LM; Paterson KB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):395-413. PubMed ID: 27893273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of contextual plausibility on word skipping during reading.
    Veldre A; Reichle ED; Wong R; Andrews S
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104184. PubMed ID: 31954289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rapid extraction of gist from visual text and its influence on word recognition.
    Asano M; Yokosawa K
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(2):127-54. PubMed ID: 21560469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Grammatical structures of emoji in Japanese-language text conversations.
    Sekine K; Ikuta M
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jul; 9(1):49. PubMed ID: 39073677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of hyperlinks on reading text.
    Fitzsimmons G; Weal MJ; Drieghe D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0210900. PubMed ID: 30726235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Syntactic processing in the absence of awareness and semantics.
    Hung SM; Hsieh PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1376-1384. PubMed ID: 26121500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.
    Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB; White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1714-1729. PubMed ID: 29672115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Affective, semantic, frequency, and descriptive norms for 107 face emojis.
    Scheffler T; Nenchev I
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Dec; 56(8):8159-8180. PubMed ID: 39147946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Emojis influence autobiographical memory retrieval from reading words: An fMRI-based study.
    Chatzichristos C; Morante M; Andreadis N; Kofidis E; Kopsinis Y; Theodoridis S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0234104. PubMed ID: 32609778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is orthographic information from multiple parafoveal words processed in parallel: An eye-tracking study.
    Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 28383965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Oculomotor and linguistic processing effects in reading dynamic horizontally scrolling text.
    Harvey H; Godwin HJ; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP; Walker R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):518-536. PubMed ID: 28080114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parafoveal processing of phonology and semantics during the reading of Korean sentences.
    Yan M; Wang A; Song H; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():104009. PubMed ID: 31295626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of word frequency and visual complexity on eye movements of young and older Chinese readers.
    Zang C; Zhang M; Bai X; Yan G; Paterson KB; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1409-25. PubMed ID: 26366620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Looking for immediate and downstream evidence of lexical prediction in eye movements during reading.
    Wong R; Veldre A; Andrews S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Oct; 77(10):2040-2064. PubMed ID: 38281065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Words from the wizarding world: Fictional words, context, and domain knowledge.
    Ingram J; Hand CJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2179-2192. PubMed ID: 32757581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.