These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33511999)
21. Exploration of Computational Approaches to Predict the Toxicity of Chemical Mixtures. Kar S; Leszczynski J Toxics; 2019 Mar; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 30893892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can acute dermal systemic toxicity tests be replaced with oral tests? A comparison of route-specific systemic toxicity and hazard classifications under the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). Moore NP; Andrew DJ; Bjerke DL; Creton S; Dreher D; Holmes T; Prieto P; Seidle T; Rowan TG Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Jun; 66(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23461858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Theory meets Industry (Erwin-Schrödinger-Institute (ESI), Vienna, Austria, 12-14 June 2007). Hafner J J Phys Condens Matter; 2008 Feb; 20(6):060301. PubMed ID: 21693862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Increasing confidence in waiving dermal toxicity studies: A comparison of oral and dermal acute data with alternative approaches for agrochemicals and products. van der Kamp S; Elliott C Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Apr; 121():104865. PubMed ID: 33453310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reflections on the progress towards non-animal methods for acute toxicity testing of chemicals. Prior H; Casey W; Kimber I; Whelan M; Sewell F Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Mar; 102():30-33. PubMed ID: 30578838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In Silico Models for Acute Systemic Toxicity. Burton J; Worth AP; Tsakovska I; Diukendjieva A Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():177-200. PubMed ID: 27311468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Acute toxicity testing of chemicals-Opportunities to avoid redundant testing and use alternative approaches. Creton S; Dewhurst IC; Earl LK; Gehen SC; Guest RL; Hotchkiss JA; Indans I; Woolhiser MR; Billington R Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 40(1):50-83. PubMed ID: 20144136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Classification of baseline toxicants for QSAR predictions to replace fish acute toxicity studies. Nendza M; Müller M; Wenzel A Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 Mar; 19(3):429-437. PubMed ID: 28165522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop. Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Acute Toxicity Prediction in Multiple Species by Leveraging Mechanistic ToxCast Mitochondrial Inhibition Data and Simulation of Oral Bioavailability. Bhhatarai B; Wilson DM; Bartels MJ; Chaudhuri S; Price PS; Carney EW Toxicol Sci; 2015 Oct; 147(2):386-96. PubMed ID: 26139166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. New Toxicology Tools and the Emerging Paradigm Shift in Environmental Health Decision-Making. Ginsberg GL; Pullen Fedinick K; Solomon GM; Elliott KC; Vandenberg JJ; Barone S; Bucher JR Environ Health Perspect; 2019 Dec; 127(12):125002. PubMed ID: 31834829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accelerating the Pace of Chemical Risk Assessment. Kavlock RJ; Bahadori T; Barton-Maclaren TS; Gwinn MR; Rasenberg M; Thomas RS Chem Res Toxicol; 2018 May; 31(5):287-290. PubMed ID: 29600706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Refinement and reduction of acute oral toxicity testing: a critical review of the use of cytotoxicity data. Schrage A; Hempel K; Schulz M; Kolle SN; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R Altern Lab Anim; 2011 Jul; 39(3):273-95. PubMed ID: 21777041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Approaches to evaluating the toxicity and carcinogenicity of man-made fibers: summary of a workshop held November 11-13, 1991, Durham, North Carolina. McClellan RO; Miller FJ; Hesterberg TW; Warheit DB; Bunn WB; Kane AB; Lippmann M; Mast RW; McConnell EE; Reinhardt CF Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1992 Dec; 16(3):321-64. PubMed ID: 1293648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating legacy contaminants and emerging chemicals in marine environments using adverse outcome pathways and biological effects-directed analysis. Hutchinson TH; Lyons BP; Thain JE; Law RJ Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Sep; 74(2):517-25. PubMed ID: 23820191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. New ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity: Report from an EPAA Blue Sky Workshop. Mahony C; Ashton RS; Birk B; Boobis AR; Cull T; Daston GP; Ewart L; Knudsen TB; Manou I; Maurer-Stroh S; Margiotta-Casaluci L; Müller BP; Nordlund P; Roberts RA; Steger-Hartmann T; Vandenbossche E; Viant MR; Vinken M; Whelan M; Zvonimir Z; Cronin MTD Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Jul; 114():104668. PubMed ID: 32335207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing LD Lane TR; Harris J; Urbina F; Ekins S J Chem Health Saf; 2023 Mar; 30(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 37457397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]