148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33512113)
1. Effective Protocol for Daily High-quality Direct Posterior Composite Restorations. The Interdental Anatomy of the Class-2 Composite Restoration.
Peumans M; Venuti P; Politano G; Van Meerbeek B
J Adhes Dent; 2021; 23(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 33512113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
Hofmann N; Hunecke A
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Closing diastemas with resin composite restorations.
Lenhard M
Eur J Esthet Dent; 2008; 3(3):258-68. PubMed ID: 19655542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of Class II composite resin restorations.
Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Kuijs RH
J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 18621458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness and surface geometry in class II direct composite restoration in-vitro.
Tolba ZO; Oraby E; Abd El Aziz PM
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):535. PubMed ID: 37533048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphological analysis of proximal contacts in class II direct restorations with 3D image reconstruction.
Chuang SF; Su KC; Wang CH; Chang CH
J Dent; 2011 Jun; 39(6):448-56. PubMed ID: 21504778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Successful restoration of load-bearing cavities in posterior teeth with direct-replacement resin-based composite.
Burke FJ; Shortall AC
Dent Update; 2001 Oct; 28(8):388-94, 396, 398. PubMed ID: 11764612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
De Moor R; Delmé K
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo Evaluation of Proximal Resin Composite Restorations performed using Three Different Matrix Systems.
Gomes IA; Filho EM; Mariz DC; Borges AH; Tonetto MR; Firoozmand LM; Kuga CM; De Jesus RR; Bandéca MC
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Aug; 16(8):643-7. PubMed ID: 26423500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel filling technique for packable composite resin in Class II restorations.
Francci C; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 12132569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The proximal precinct in direct posterior composite restorations: interproximal integrity.
Liebenberg WH
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 14(7):587-94; quiz 596. PubMed ID: 12373946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Restoration techniques and marginal overhang in Class II composite resin restorations.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 19524348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the proximal contact tightness in class II resin composite restorations using different contact forming instruments: a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
Abbassy KM; Elmahy WA; Holiel AA
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):729. PubMed ID: 37805456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Class II composite restorations and proximal concavities: clinical implications and management.
Patras M; Doukoudakis S
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 22788722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
