428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33514342)
1. Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial.
Meek CL; Corcoy R; Asztalos E; Kusinski LC; López E; Feig DS; Murphy HR;
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jan; 21(1):96. PubMed ID: 33514342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.
Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC
PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21
Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.
Choi SKY; Gordon A; Hilder L; Henry A; Hyett JA; Brew BK; Joseph F; Jorm L; Chambers GM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the role of maternal race on the prediction of NICU admission by three growth charts: a cross-sectional study.
Nahirney M; Chaput KH; Metcalfe A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Apr; 34(8):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 31189402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study.
Vieira MC; Relph S; Persson M; Seed PT; Pasupathy D
PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002902. PubMed ID: 31539391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.
Tarca AL; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Erez O; Hernandez-Andrade E; Yeo L; Bhatti G; Pacora P; Maymon E; Hassan SS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S679-S691.e4. PubMed ID: 29422207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term.
Pritchard N; Lindquist A; Siqueira IDA; Walker SP; Permezel M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):961-966. PubMed ID: 30372647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Disproportionate body composition and perinatal outcome in large-for-gestational-age infants to mothers with type 1 diabetes.
Persson M; Pasupathy D; Hanson U; Norman M
BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):565-72. PubMed ID: 22304387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome.
Sovio U; Smith GCS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S738-S744. PubMed ID: 29199029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity.
Anderson NH; Sadler LC; McKinlay CJD; McCowan LME
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):509.e1-509.e7. PubMed ID: 26546850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performances of birthweight charts to predict adverse perinatal outcomes related to SGA in a cohort of nulliparas.
Galvão RB; Souza RT; Vieira MC; Pasupathy D; Mayrink J; Feitosa FE; Rocha Filho EA; Leite DF; Vettorazzi J; Calderon IM; Sousa MH; Cecatti JG;
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Aug; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 35927626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies.
Chiossi G; Pedroza C; Costantine MM; Truong VTT; Gargano G; Saade GR
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 50(2):156-166. PubMed ID: 27935148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association Between Paternal Age and Birth Weight in Preterm and Full-Term Birth: A Retrospective Study.
Mao Y; Zhang C; Wang Y; Meng Y; Chen L; Dennis CL; Sheng J; Wu Y; Huang H
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():706369. PubMed ID: 34367073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Customized GROW vs INTERGROWTH-21
Fay E; Hugh O; Francis A; Katz R; Sitcov K; Souter V; Gardosi J
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar; 4(2):100545. PubMed ID: 34875415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of INTERGROWTH-21 and Fenton growth standards to assess size at birth and extrauterine growth in very preterm infants.
Tuzun F; Yucesoy E; Baysal B; Kumral A; Duman N; Ozkan H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Sep; 31(17):2252-2257. PubMed ID: 28587527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neonatal morbidity and small and large size for gestation: a comparison of birthweight centiles.
Cartwright RD; Anderson NH; Sadler LC; Harding JE; McCowan LME; McKinlay CJD
J Perinatol; 2020 May; 40(5):732-742. PubMed ID: 32080336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
Tarca AL; Hernandez-Andrade E; Ahn H; Garcia M; Xu Z; Korzeniewski SJ; Saker H; Chaiworapongsa T; Hassan SS; Yeo L; Romero R
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0164161. PubMed ID: 27802270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prepregnancy body mass index is an independent risk factor for gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, preterm labor, and small- and large-for-gestational-age infants.
Shin D; Song WO
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015; 28(14):1679-86. PubMed ID: 25211384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does maternal stature modify the association between infants who are small or large for gestational age and adverse perinatal outcomes? A retrospective cohort study.
Yearwood L; Bone JN; Wen Q; Muraca GM; Lyons J; Razaz N; Joseph KS; Lisonkova S
BJOG; 2023 Apr; 130(5):464-475. PubMed ID: 36424901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
