These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3351438)

  • 1. Adjusting delay to reinforcement: comparing choice in pigeons and humans.
    Rodriguez ML; Logue AW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Jan; 14(1):105-17. PubMed ID: 3351438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amount-dependent temporal discounting?
    Ong EL; White KG
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 15157973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on inter-temporal choice: further observations with an adjusting-delay procedure.
    da Costa Araújo S; Body S; Hampson CL; Langley RW; Deakin JF; Anderson IM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 202(2):272-7. PubMed ID: 19463712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting.
    Mazur JE; Biondi DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Mar; 91(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 19794834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice.
    Mazur JE; Snyderman M; Coe D
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Oct; 11(4):565-75. PubMed ID: 4067510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
    Pitts RC; Febbo SM
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the terminal-link effect depend on duration or reinforcement rate?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 15182927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jul; 46(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 3746189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determinants of choice for pigeons and humans on concurrent-chains schedules of reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD; Powell RA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Sep; 52(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 2794844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.
    Ito M; Nakamura K
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 9465415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timescale invariance and Weber's law in choice.
    Jozefowiez J; Cerutti DT; Staddon JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 16834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of rate of reinforcement and rate of change on choice behaviour in transition.
    Mazur JE
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1997 May; 50(2):111-28. PubMed ID: 9225619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pigeons prefer conditional stimuli over their absence: a comment on Roberts et al. (2009).
    Zentall TR; Stagner JP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20718554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcer probability, reinforcer magnitude, and the reinforcement context for remembering.
    Brown GS; White KG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 19364232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of variable training, signaled and unsignaled delays, and d-amphetamine on delay-discounting functions.
    Slezak JM; Anderson KG
    Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Sep; 20(5-6):424-36. PubMed ID: 19730365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 17343994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Varying initial-link and terminal-link durations in concurrent-chains schedules: a comparison of three models.
    Mazur JE
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 15157972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the dynamics of choice.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 19429211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Energy budget versus temporal discounting as determinants of preference in risky choice.
    Orduña V; Bouzas A
    Behav Processes; 2004 Sep; 67(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 15240052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.