These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33514455)

  • 21. Validation of the BPro radial pulse waveform acquisition device in pregnancy and gestational hypertensive disorders.
    Jakes A; Wade J; Vowles Z; Seed PT; Shennan AH; Chappell LC; Nzelu D
    Blood Press Monit; 2021 Oct; 26(5):380-384. PubMed ID: 34128489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy].
    Dürig P; Ferrier C; Schneider H
    Ther Umsch; 1999 Oct; 56(10):561-71. PubMed ID: 10549228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of the iHealth Track and Omron HEM-9210T automated blood pressure devices for use in pregnancy.
    Van Den Heuvel JFM; Lely AT; Franx A; Bekker MN
    Pregnancy Hypertens; 2019 Jan; 15():37-41. PubMed ID: 30825925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prognostic value of office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in pregnancy.
    Hermida RC; Ayala DE
    Hypertension; 2002 Sep; 40(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 12215470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric automated blood pressure monitors in the setting of preeclampsia.
    Natarajan P; Shennan AH; Penny J; Halligan AW; de Swiet M; Anthony J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1203-10. PubMed ID: 10561646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of the SunTech Medical Advantage Model 2 Series Automated Blood Pressure Module in Pregnancy.
    Kuper SG; Dotson KN; Anderson SB; Harris SL; Harper LM; Tita AT
    Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jan; 36(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 29906797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Agreement of aneroid and oscillometric blood pressure devices used in pregnancy.
    Aldridge E; Mollen J; Verburg PE; Wittwer M; Dekker G; Roberts CT; Arstall MA
    Pregnancy Hypertens; 2019 Jul; 17():43-48. PubMed ID: 31487654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
    Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Twenty-four-hour automated blood pressure monitoring as a predictor of preeclampsia.
    Brown MA; Bowyer L; McHugh L; Davis GK; Mangos GJ; Jones M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Sep; 185(3):618-22. PubMed ID: 11568788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 1. Definitions, evaluation and classification of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.
    Helewa ME; Burrows RF; Smith J; Williams K; Brain P; Rabkin SW
    CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(6):715-25. PubMed ID: 9307560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: definition, management, and out-of-office blood pressure measurement.
    Metoki H; Iwama N; Hamada H; Satoh M; Murakami T; Ishikuro M; Obara T
    Hypertens Res; 2022 Aug; 45(8):1298-1309. PubMed ID: 35726086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automated blood pressure measurement devices: a potential source of morbidity in preeclampsia?
    Quinn M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 170(5 Pt 1):1303-7. PubMed ID: 8178857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Home self-monitoring of blood pressure: is fully automated oscillometric technique as good as conventional stethoscopic technique?
    Stergiou GS; Voutsa AV; Achimastos AD; Mountokalakis TD
    Am J Hypertens; 1997 Apr; 10(4 Pt 1):428-33. PubMed ID: 9128209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is home blood-pressure monitoring in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy consistent with clinic recordings?
    Kalafat E; Mir I; Perry H; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Oct; 52(4):515-521. PubMed ID: 29786155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Masked pregnancy-associated hypertension as a predictor of adverse outcomes.
    Mussarat N; Biggio J; Martin J; Morgan J; Tivis R; Elmayan A; Williams FB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jul; 5(7):100976. PubMed ID: 37098390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Time poor: rushing decreases the accuracy and reliability of blood pressure measurement technique in pregnancy.
    Reinders LW; Mos CN; Thornton C; Ogle R; Makris A; Child A; Hennessy A
    Hypertens Pregnancy; 2006; 25(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 16867915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Office blood pressure values and the necessity of out-of-office measurements in high-risk pregnancies.
    Salazar MR; Espeche WG; Balbín E; Leiva Sisnieguez CE; Leiva Sisnieguez BC; Stavile RN; March C; Olano RD; Soria A; Yoma O; Prudente M; Torres S; Grassi F; Santillan C; Carrera Ramos P; Carbajal HA
    J Hypertens; 2019 Sep; 37(9):1838-1844. PubMed ID: 31157745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
    Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Task force IV: Clinical use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Participants of the 1999 Consensus Conference on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
    Staessen JA; Beilin L; Parati G; Waeber B; White W
    Blood Press Monit; 1999 Dec; 4(6):319-31. PubMed ID: 10602536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.