These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3351489)

  • 1. Effects of incidental pictorial and verbal adjuncts on text learning.
    Terry WS; Howe DC
    J Gen Psychol; 1988 Jan; 115(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 3351489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pictorial cues and enhancement of patient recall of instructions or information.
    Reed LA; Hoffman LG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Apr; 57(4):312-5. PubMed ID: 3700955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
    Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Verbal descriptions of spatial information can interfere with picture processing.
    Schüler A; Scheiter K; Gerjets P
    Memory; 2012; 20(7):682-99. PubMed ID: 22734801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The interactive effects of prior knowledge and text structure on memory for cognitive psychology texts.
    Wylie J; McGuinness C
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2004 Dec; 74(Pt 4):497-514. PubMed ID: 15530198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between the impact of noise from aircraft, road traffic and trains on long-term recall and recognition of a text in children aged 12-14 years.
    Hygge S
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 1993; 88():416-27. PubMed ID: 8460382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts.
    Wolfe MB; Woodwyk JM
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2010 Sep; 80(Pt 3):341-62. PubMed ID: 20128958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving text memory by organizing interfering text at retrieval.
    Mann T; Brenner LA
    Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 8989857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Four-year-old children's visual attention in direct and observational learning.
    Ohnogi H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Jun; 62(3):783-8. PubMed ID: 3725515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integration of nonthematic details in pictures and passages.
    Viera CL; Homa DL
    Am J Psychol; 1991; 104(4):491-516. PubMed ID: 1793124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Picture books, not readers! Teachers use the wrong modality in presentations and students in studying.
    Westman AS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):840-2. PubMed ID: 2377418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of prior knowledge and elaboration in text comprehension and memory: a comparison of self-generated elaboration and text-provided elaboration.
    Kim SI; Van Dusen LM
    Am J Psychol; 1998; 111(3):353-78. PubMed ID: 9805361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On-line processing of textual illustrations in the visuospatial sketchpad: evidence from dual-task studies.
    Kruley P; Sciama SC; Glenberg AM
    Mem Cognit; 1994 May; 22(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 8007830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Presentation rate and the representation of briefly glimpsed pictures in memory.
    Intraub H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Jan; 6(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7373241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulation of artificial vision: II. Eccentric reading of full-page text and the learning of this task.
    Sommerhalder J; Rappaz B; de Haller R; Fornos AP; Safran AB; Pelizzone M
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15136004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Connecticut Pictorial Learning Test: a pictorial version of the California Verbal Learning Test.
    Stevens MC; Fein DA; Markus E
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2001 Feb; 15(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 11778582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity.
    Sanchez CA; Wiley J
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):344-55. PubMed ID: 16752598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some analyses of forgetting of pictorial material in amnesic and demented patients.
    Martone M; Butters N; Trauner D
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1986 Jun; 8(3):161-78. PubMed ID: 2941450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces.
    Light LL; Kayra-Stuart F; Hollander S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1979 May; 5(3):212-28. PubMed ID: 528913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of detail information in the recognition of complex pictorial stimuli.
    Weaver GE; Stanny CJ
    J Gen Psychol; 1984 Oct; 111(2ND Half):185-99. PubMed ID: 6512514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.