These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33515017)

  • 1. Persistent confusion in nutrition and obesity research about the validity of classic nonparametric tests in the presence of heteroscedasticity: evidence of the problem and valid alternatives.
    Kroeger CM; Ejima K; Hannon BA; Halliday TM; McComb B; Teran-Garcia M; Dawson JA; King DB; Brown AW; Allison DB
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2021 Mar; 113(3):517-524. PubMed ID: 33515017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence of misuse of nonparametric tests in the presence of heteroscedasticity within obesity research.
    Kroeger CM; Hannon BA; Halliday TM; Ejima K; Teran-Garcia M; Brown AW
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():391. PubMed ID: 35136571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heterogeneity of variance in clinical data.
    Grissom RJ
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2000 Feb; 68(1):155-65. PubMed ID: 10710850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Murine genetic models of obesity: type I error rates and the power of commonly used analyses as assessed by plasmode-based simulation.
    Ejima K; Brown AW; Smith DL; Beyaztas U; Allison DB
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2020 Jun; 44(6):1440-1449. PubMed ID: 32099106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method.
    Dwivedi AK; Mallawaarachchi I; Alvarado LA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2187-2205. PubMed ID: 28276584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A note on consistency of non-parametric rank tests and related rank transformations.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 21518333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better.
    Vetter TR; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):338-342. PubMed ID: 29189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hypothesis testing III: counts and medians.
    Applegate KE; Tello R; Ying J
    Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):603-8. PubMed ID: 12881587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size determinations for Welch's test in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):72-93. PubMed ID: 23316952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A SAS macro for testing differences among three or more independent groups using Kruskal-Wallis and Nemenyi tests.
    Liu Y; Chen W
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2012 Feb; 32(1):130-134. PubMed ID: 22282259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Do we always correctly interpret the results of statistical nonparametric tests].
    Moczko JA
    Przegl Lek; 2014; 71(11):654-8. PubMed ID: 25799864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.
    Erceg-Hurn DM; Mirosevich VM
    Am Psychol; 2008 Oct; 63(7):591-601. PubMed ID: 18855490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Managing heteroscedasticity in general linear models.
    Rosopa PJ; Schaffer MM; Schroeder AN
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):335-51. PubMed ID: 24015776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
    Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rank-based permutation approaches for non-parametric factorial designs.
    Umlauft M; Konietschke F; Pauly M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):368-390. PubMed ID: 28295183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():101-115. PubMed ID: 29408478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biostatistics Series Module 3: Comparing Groups: Numerical Variables.
    Hazra A; Gogtay N
    Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 27293244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introduction to biostatistics: Part 5, Statistical inference techniques for hypothesis testing with nonparametric data.
    Gaddis GM; Gaddis ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 1990 Sep; 19(9):1054-9. PubMed ID: 2203291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical significance levels of nonparametric tests biased by heterogeneous variances of treatment groups.
    Zimmerman DW
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Oct; 127(4):354-64. PubMed ID: 11109998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.