These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33515309)

  • 1. Fruit crops in the era of genome editing: closing the regulatory gap.
    Alvarez D; Cerda-Bennasser P; Stowe E; Ramirez-Torres F; Capell T; Dhingra A; Christou P
    Plant Cell Rep; 2021 Jun; 40(6):915-930. PubMed ID: 33515309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Will the EU stay out of step with science and the rest of the world on plant breeding innovation?
    Jorasch P
    Plant Cell Rep; 2020 Jan; 39(1):163-167. PubMed ID: 31754780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genome editing in fruit, ornamental, and industrial crops.
    Ramirez-Torres F; Ghogare R; Stowe E; Cerdá-Bennasser P; Lobato-Gómez M; Williamson-Benavides BA; Giron-Calva PS; Hewitt S; Christou P; Dhingra A
    Transgenic Res; 2021 Aug; 30(4):499-528. PubMed ID: 33825100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perspectives on the Application of Genome-Editing Technologies in Crop Breeding.
    Hua K; Zhang J; Botella JR; Ma C; Kong F; Liu B; Zhu JK
    Mol Plant; 2019 Aug; 12(8):1047-1059. PubMed ID: 31260812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CRISPR/Cas systems: opportunities and challenges for crop breeding.
    Biswas S; Zhang D; Shi J
    Plant Cell Rep; 2021 Jun; 40(6):979-998. PubMed ID: 33977326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Canadian regulatory aspects of gene editing technologies.
    Ellens KW; Levac D; Pearson C; Savoie A; Strand N; Louter J; Tibelius C
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):165-168. PubMed ID: 31321700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts.
    Sprink T; Eriksson D; Schiemann J; Hartung F
    Plant Cell Rep; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1493-506. PubMed ID: 27142995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs: Scope and Definitions.
    Eriksson D; Custers R; Edvardsson Björnberg K; Hansson SO; Purnhagen K; Qaim M; Romeis J; Schiemann J; Schleissing S; Tosun J; Visser RGF
    Trends Biotechnol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):231-234. PubMed ID: 32059122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genome editing of polyploid crops: prospects, achievements and bottlenecks.
    Schaart JG; van de Wiel CCM; Smulders MJM
    Transgenic Res; 2021 Aug; 30(4):337-351. PubMed ID: 33846956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security.
    Georges F; Ray H
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 28075688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application and future perspective of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in fruit crops.
    Zhou J; Li D; Wang G; Wang F; Kunjal M; Joldersma D; Liu Z
    J Integr Plant Biol; 2020 Mar; 62(3):269-286. PubMed ID: 30791200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation.
    Whelan AI; Lema MA
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 28080208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CRISPR-Cas9 Application in Canadian Public and Private Plant Breeding.
    Gleim S; Lubieniechi S; Smyth SJ
    CRISPR J; 2020 Feb; 3(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 32091256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing.
    Ishii T; Araki M
    Plant Cell Rep; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1507-18. PubMed ID: 27038939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Targeted modification of plant genomes for precision crop breeding.
    Hilscher J; Bürstmayr H; Stoger E
    Biotechnol J; 2017 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 27726285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Looking forward to genetically edited fruit crops.
    Nagamangala Kanchiswamy C; Sargent DJ; Velasco R; Maffei ME; Malnoy M
    Trends Biotechnol; 2015 Feb; 33(2):62-4. PubMed ID: 25129425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Targeted mutagenesis using zinc-finger nucleases in perennial fruit trees.
    Peer R; Rivlin G; Golobovitch S; Lapidot M; Gal-On A; Vainstein A; Tzfira T; Flaishman MA
    Planta; 2015 Apr; 241(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 25528147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Editing EU legislation to fit plant genome editing: The use of genome editing technologies in plant breeding requires a novel regulatory approach for new plant varieties that involves farmers.
    Ricroch AE; Ammann K; Kuntz M
    EMBO Rep; 2016 Oct; 17(10):1365-1369. PubMed ID: 27629042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome Editing in Agriculture: Technical and Practical Considerations.
    Jansing J; Schiermeyer A; Schillberg S; Fischer R; Bortesi L
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 31200517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.
    Davison J; Ammann K
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):13-34. PubMed ID: 28278120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.