229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33516651)
1. Correlation between craniofacial structures, anthropometric measurements, and nasopharyngeal dimensions in black adolescents.
Al-Jewair T; Marwah S; Preston CB; Wu Y; Yu G
Int Orthod; 2021 Mar; 19(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 33516651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with Class I occlusion.
Al-Jewair TS; Preston CB; Flores-Mir C; Ziarnowski P
Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(2):37-45. PubMed ID: 29898156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of BMI percentile on craniofacial morphology and development in adolescents,Part II: elevated BMI is associated with larger final facial dimensions.
Hancock S; Carmack A; Kocher M; Rezende Silva E; Sulkowski T; Nanney E; Graves C; Mitchell K; Jacox LA
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 37932128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation.
Mellion ZJ; Behrents RG; Johnston LE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):845-54. PubMed ID: 23726335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cephalometric norms of a Burkina Faso population.
Ouédraogo Y; Benyahia H; Diouf JS; Camara T; Bationo R; Ngom PI
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 30772356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Nasopharyngeal changes in 8-13 years old healthy children in China: a longitudinal study].
Liu SS; Deng JR; Wang DS; Gong X; Zhou YH; Gao XM
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 51(10):733-739. PubMed ID: 27765101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cephalometric analysis of craniofacial morphology and growth in unrepaired isolated cleft palate patients.
Xu Y; Yang C; Schreuder WH; Shi J; Shi B; Zheng Q; Wang Y
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1853-60. PubMed ID: 25169446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between skeletal changes by maxillary protraction and upper airway dimensions.
Lee JW; Park KH; Kim SH; Park YG; Kim SJ
Angle Orthod; 2011 May; 81(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 21299388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of airway volume changes after rapid maxillary expansion.
Smith T; Ghoneima A; Stewart K; Liu S; Eckert G; Halum S; Kula K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):618-26. PubMed ID: 22554756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of growth prediction with hand-wrist radiographs.
Verma D; Peltomäki T; Jäger A
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 19395369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Craniofacial skeletal pattern: is it really correlated with the degree of adenoid obstruction?
Feres MF; Muniz TS; de Andrade SH; Lemos Mde M; Pignatari SS
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(4):68-75. PubMed ID: 26352848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Airway space changes after nasopharyngeal adenoidectomy in conjunction with Le Fort I osteotomy.
Wolford LM; Perez D; Stevao E; Perez E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 70(3):665-71. PubMed ID: 21684660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of SEC III protocol on upper airway dimensions in growing class III patients: a retrospective study.
Elkalza AR; Yacout YM
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):841. PubMed ID: 37940933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues.
Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative nasopharyngeal patency index as possible objective indication for adenoidectomy in children with orthodontic problems.
Krasny M; Wysocki J; Zadurska M; Skarżyński PH
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Feb; 75(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 21129788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The maxillary incisor display at rest: analysis of the underlying components.
Jeelani W; Fida M; Shaikh A
Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(6):48-55. PubMed ID: 30672985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
