These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33516720)

  • 21. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report.
    Stumpel LJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):442-53. PubMed ID: 20156227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Deviation of dental implants placed using a novel 3D-printed surgical guide: An in vitro study.
    Etajuri EA; Suliman E; Mahmood WAA; Ibrahim N; Buzayan M; Mohd NR
    Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(4):359-362. PubMed ID: 33448161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intaglio Surface Dimension and Guide Tube Deviations of Implant Surgical Guides Influenced by Printing Layer Thickness and Angulation Setting.
    Dalal N; Ammoun R; Abdulmajeed AA; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 31886914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of autoclaving and disinfection on 3D surgical guides using LCD technology for dental implant.
    Labakoum B; Farhan A; Taleb LB; Mouhsen A; Lyazidi A
    3D Print Med; 2024 Apr; 10(1):14. PubMed ID: 38656429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques.
    Reyes A; Turkyilmaz I; Prihoda TJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 25681352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A survey of infertility, surgical sterility and associated reproductive disability in Perth, Western Australia.
    Webb S; Holman D
    Aust J Public Health; 1992 Dec; 16(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 1296786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of the reproducibility and precision of milling and 3D printing surgical guides.
    Mukai S; Mukai E; Santos-Junior JA; Shibli JA; Faveri M; Giro G
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 33388028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CAD/CAM-produced surgical guides: Optimizing the treatment workflow.
    Neugebauer J; Kistler F; Kistler S; Züdorf G; Freyer D; Ritter L; Dreiseidler T; Kusch J; Zöller JE
    Int J Comput Dent; 2011; 14(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 21877375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide.
    Kim T; Lee S; Kim GB; Hong D; Kwon J; Park JW; Kim N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):195-201.e2. PubMed ID: 31753464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of Implant Placement Position Using Nondental Open-Source Software: An In Vitro Study.
    Talmazov G; Bencharit S; Waldrop TC; Ammoun R
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):604-610. PubMed ID: 32495453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study.
    Chen X; Yuan J; Wang C; Huang Y; Kang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study.
    Yeung M; Abdulmajeed A; Carrico CK; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):821-828. PubMed ID: 31653399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed.
    Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computer-aided design and manufacturing of surgical templates and their clinical applications: a review.
    Chen X; Xu L; Wang W; Li X; Sun Y; Politis C
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016 Sep; 13(9):853-64. PubMed ID: 27479020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. First comparison of a new dynamic navigation system and surgical guides for implantology: an in vitro study.
    Duré M; Berlinghoff F; Kollmuss M; Hickel R; Huth KC
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb; 24(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 34006059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How useful is 3D printing in maxillofacial surgery?
    Louvrier A; Marty P; Barrabé A; Euvrard E; Chatelain B; Weber E; Meyer C
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 118(4):206-212. PubMed ID: 28732777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bone Reduction to Facilitate Immediate Implant Placement and Loading Using CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Patients With Terminal Dentition.
    Alzoubi F; Massoomi N; Nattestad A
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Oct; 42(5):406-410. PubMed ID: 27276111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trephination-based, guided surgical implant placement: A clinical study.
    Suriyan N; Sarinnaphakorn L; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):411-416. PubMed ID: 30503150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
    Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In-office fabrication of dental implant surgical guides using desktop stereolithographic printing and implant treatment planning software: A clinical report.
    Whitley D; Eidson RS; Rudek I; Bencharit S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):256-263. PubMed ID: 28222882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.