These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33517013)

  • 1. Environmental burdens of small-scale intensive pig production in China.
    Liu X; Cai Z; Yuan Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 May; 770():144720. PubMed ID: 33517013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mitigating environmental impacts using net energy system in feed formulation in China's pig production.
    Hu Q; Shi H; Wang L; Wang L; Hou Y; Wang H; Lai C; Zhang S
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 856(Pt 1):159103. PubMed ID: 36181803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China.
    Wu H; Liu Y; Dai C; Ye Y; Zhu H; Fang W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; 31(14):21668-21686. PubMed ID: 38393572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Life cycle assessment of Chinese shrimp farming systems targeted for export and domestic sales.
    Cao L; Diana JS; Keoleian GA; Lai Q
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6531-8. PubMed ID: 21714571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hotspots and bottlenecks for the enhancement of the environmental sustainability of pig systems, with emphasis on European pig systems.
    Pexas G; Kyriazakis I
    Porcine Health Manag; 2023 Nov; 9(1):53. PubMed ID: 37974286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accounting for uncertainty in the quantification of the environmental impacts of Canadian pig farming systems.
    Mackenzie SG; Leinonen I; Ferguson N; Kyriazakis I
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):3130-43. PubMed ID: 26115299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental impacts of medium-scale pig farming at technical and economic optimum production weight in Mexico.
    Del Rosario Villavicencio-Gutiérrez M; Martínez-Castañeda FE; Rogers-Montoya NA; Martínez-Campos AR; Gómez-Tenorio G; Velazquez L; Peñuelas-Rivas CG
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jun; 946():174240. PubMed ID: 38925383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: broiler production systems.
    Leinonen I; Williams AG; Wiseman J; Guy J; Kyriazakis I
    Poult Sci; 2012 Jan; 91(1):8-25. PubMed ID: 22184424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance.
    de Quelen F; Brossard L; Wilfart A; Dourmad JY; Garcia-Launay F
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():689012. PubMed ID: 34295934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental impact of heavy pig production in a sample of Italian farms. A cradle to farm-gate analysis.
    Pirlo G; Carè S; Casa GD; Marchetti R; Ponzoni G; Faeti V; Fantin V; Masoni P; Buttol P; Zerbinatti L; Falconi F
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Sep; 565():576-585. PubMed ID: 27203518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contribution of additives Cu to its accumulation in pig feces: study in Beijing and Fuxin of China.
    Li YX; Li W; Wu J; Xu LC; Su QH; Xiong X
    J Environ Sci (China); 2007; 19(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 17915692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Life cycle assessment of alternative swine management practices.
    Bandekar PA; Leh M; Bautista R; Matlock MD; Thoma G; Ulrich R
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jan; 97(1):472-484. PubMed ID: 30395291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mitigation potential for carbon and nitrogen emissions in pig production systems: lessons from the North China Plain.
    Wang H; Zhang X; Ma Y; Hou Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jul; 725():138482. PubMed ID: 32304969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental implications of anaerobic digestion for manure management in dairy farms in Mexico: a life cycle perspective.
    Rivas-García P; Botello-Álvarez JE; Abel Seabra JE; da Silva Walter AC; Estrada-Baltazar A
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(17):2198-209. PubMed ID: 25732709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lower pork consumption and technological change in feed production can reduce the pork supply chain environmental footprint in China.
    Tong B; Zhang L; Hou Y; Oenema O; Long W; Velthof G; Ma W; Zhang F
    Nat Food; 2023 Jan; 4(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 37118572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feeding strategies and manure management for cost-effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms in Wisconsin.
    Dutreuil M; Wattiaux M; Hardie CA; Cabrera VE
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5904-17. PubMed ID: 24996278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental trade-offs of pig production systems under varied operational efficiencies.
    McAuliffe GA; Takahashi T; Mogensen L; Hermansen JE; Sage CL; Chapman DV; Lee MRF
    J Clean Prod; 2017 Nov; 165():1163-1173. PubMed ID: 29104375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: egg production systems.
    Leinonen I; Williams AG; Wiseman J; Guy J; Kyriazakis I
    Poult Sci; 2012 Jan; 91(1):26-40. PubMed ID: 22184425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of feeding strategy on environmental impacts of pig fattening in different contexts of production: evaluation through life cycle assessment.
    Monteiro AN; Garcia-Launay F; Brossard L; Wilfart A; Dourmad JY
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4832-4847. PubMed ID: 27898927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How can we improve the environmental sustainability of poultry production?
    Leinonen I; Kyriazakis I
    Proc Nutr Soc; 2016 Aug; 75(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 26935025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.