These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33517013)

  • 21. Carbon footprint of conventional and organic beef production systems: An Italian case study.
    Buratti C; Fantozzi F; Barbanera M; Lascaro E; Chiorri M; Cecchini L
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 576():129-137. PubMed ID: 27783931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Greenhouse gas, water, and land footprint per unit of production of the California dairy industry over 50 years.
    Naranjo A; Johnson A; Rossow H; Kebreab E
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Apr; 103(4):3760-3773. PubMed ID: 32037166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Grazing intensity affects the environmental impact of dairy systems.
    Aguirre-Villegas HA; Passos-Fonseca TH; Reinemann DJ; Larson R
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Aug; 100(8):6804-6821. PubMed ID: 28601442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anaerobic digestion and milking frequency as mitigation strategies of the environmental burden in the milk production system.
    Bacenetti J; Bava L; Zucali M; Lovarelli D; Sandrucci A; Tamburini A; Fiala M
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 539():450-459. PubMed ID: 26383852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a food-production system in Spain: Iberian ham based on an extensive system.
    Lamnatou C; Ezcurra-Ciaurriz X; Chemisana D; Plà-Aragonés LM
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 808():151900. PubMed ID: 34838553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Environmental impact of using specialty feed ingredients in swine and poultry production: A life cycle assessment.
    Kebreab E; Liedke A; Caro D; Deimling S; Binder M; Finkbeiner M
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jun; 94(6):2664-81. PubMed ID: 27285941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Carbon and water footprint of pork supply chain in Catalonia: From feed to final products.
    Noya I; Aldea X; Gasol CM; González-García S; Amores MJ; Colón J; Ponsá S; Roman I; Rubio MA; Casas E; Moreira MT; Boschmonart-Rives J
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 171():133-143. PubMed ID: 26861226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can farmers mitigate environmental impacts through combined production of food, fuel and feed? A consequential life cycle assessment of integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery.
    Parajuli R; Dalgaard T; Birkved M
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 619-620():127-143. PubMed ID: 29145050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sustainability evaluation of pasteurized milk production with a life cycle assessment approach: An Iranian case study.
    Rafiee S; Khoshnevisan B; Mohammadi I; Aghbashlo M; Mousazadeh H; Clark S
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 562():614-627. PubMed ID: 27110976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Life cycle environmental impacts of food away from home and mitigation strategies-a review.
    Dai T; Yang Y; Lee R; Fleischer AS; Wemhoff AP
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jul; 265():110471. PubMed ID: 32292177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Environmental assessment of energy production from anaerobic digestion of pig manure at medium-scale using life cycle assessment.
    Ramírez-Islas ME; Güereca LP; Sosa-Rodriguez FS; Cobos-Peralta MA
    Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():85-96. PubMed ID: 31669678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Management model for assessment of nitrogen flow from feed to pig manure after storage in Vietnam.
    Vu TK; Vu CC; Médoc JM; Flindt MR; Sommer SG
    Environ Technol; 2012; 33(4-6):725-31. PubMed ID: 22629649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products--are the differences captured by life cycle assessment?
    Meier MS; Stoessel F; Jungbluth N; Juraske R; Schader C; Stolze M
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Feb; 149():193-208. PubMed ID: 25463583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Consequential environmental life cycle assessment of a farm-scale biogas plant.
    Van Stappen F; Mathot M; Decruyenaere V; Loriers A; Delcour A; Planchon V; Goffart JP; Stilmant D
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 175():20-32. PubMed ID: 27017269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors affecting life cycle assessment of milk produced on 6 Mediterranean buffalo farms.
    Pirlo G; Carè S; Fantin V; Falconi F; Buttol P; Terzano GM; Masoni P; Pacelli C
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6583-93. PubMed ID: 25129494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of farming strategies on environmental impact of intensive dairy farms in Italy.
    Guerci M; Bava L; Zucali M; Sandrucci A; Penati C; Tamburini A
    J Dairy Res; 2013 Aug; 80(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 23806128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment.
    Mosnier E; van der Werf HM; Boissy J; Dourmad JY
    Animal; 2011 Dec; 5(12):1972-83. PubMed ID: 22440474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Carbon footprint of dairy goat milk production in New Zealand.
    Robertson K; Symes W; Garnham M
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4279-93. PubMed ID: 25981064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production.
    Andretta I; Hauschild L; Kipper M; Pires PGS; Pomar C
    Animal; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1990-1998. PubMed ID: 29198226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The environmental performance of different pork production scenarios: a life cycle assessment study.
    Villavicencio-Gutiérrez MR; Rogers-Montoya NA; Martínez-Campos R; Gómez-Tenorio G; Martínez-Castañeda FE
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Jan; 54(1):44. PubMed ID: 35015158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.