158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33517022)
1. The analogy between DNA kinship and DNA mixture evaluation, with applications for the interpretation of likelihood ratios produced by possibly imperfect models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102449. PubMed ID: 33517022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A top-down approach to DNA mixtures.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102250. PubMed ID: 32169810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of missing persons through kinship analysis by microhaplotype sequencing of single-source DNA and two-person DNA mixtures.
Bai Z; Zhang N; Liu J; Ding H; Zhang Y; Wang T; Gao J; Ou X
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 May; 58():102689. PubMed ID: 35316721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of likelihood ratios with and without assuming relatedness for DNA mixtures interpreted using a continuous model.
Kruijver M; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102800. PubMed ID: 36372011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Casework applications of probabilistic genotyping methods for DNA mixtures that allow relationships between contributors.
Green PJ; Mortera J; Prieto L
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102482. PubMed ID: 33640736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The comparison of DNA mixture profiles with multiple persons of interest.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jan; 56():102592. PubMed ID: 34739935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved individual identification in DNA mixtures of unrelated or related contributors through massively parallel sequencing.
Liu Z; Wu E; Li R; Liu J; Zang Y; Cong B; Wu R; Xie B; Sun H
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jun; 72():103078. PubMed ID: 38889491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying common donors in DNA mixtures, with applications to database searches.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jan; 26():40-47. PubMed ID: 27780107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A genotype likelihood function for DNA mixtures.
Crysup B; Woerner AE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Nov; 61():102776. PubMed ID: 36152508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating DNA evidence possibly involving multiple (mixed) samples, common donors and related contributors.
Kruijver M; Taylor D; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Sep; 54():102532. PubMed ID: 34130043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contributors are a nuisance (parameter) for DNA mixture evidence evaluation.
Slooten K; Caliebe A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():116-125. PubMed ID: 30145539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.
Slooten KJ; Egeland T
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 26160753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relaxing the assumption of unrelatedness in the numerator and denominator of likelihood ratios for DNA mixtures.
Allen PS; Pugh SN; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Curran JM; Kerr Z; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Mar; 51():102434. PubMed ID: 33348219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation into the effect of mixtures comprising related people on non-donor likelihood ratios, and potential practises to mitigate providing misleading opinions.
Kalafut T; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102691. PubMed ID: 35390645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Considering relatives when assessing the evidential strength of mixed DNA profiles.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():259-63. PubMed ID: 25259769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The likelihood ratio as a random variable for linked markers in kinship analysis.
Egeland T; Slooten K
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Nov; 130(6):1445-1456. PubMed ID: 27519910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
