These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33519170)

  • 1. Printed Electroceutical Dressings for the Inhibition of Biofilms and Treatment of Chronic Wounds.
    Heald R; Bennett M; Subramaniam VV; Dusane D; Lochab V; Sundaram PM; Salyer S; West JD; Stoodley P; Prakash S
    J Microelectromech Syst; 2020 Oct; 29(5):918-923. PubMed ID: 33519170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electric Field Based Dressing Disrupts Mixed-Species Bacterial Biofilm Infection and Restores Functional Wound Healing.
    Barki KG; Das A; Dixith S; Ghatak PD; Mathew-Steiner S; Schwab E; Khanna S; Wozniak DJ; Roy S; Sen CK
    Ann Surg; 2019 Apr; 269(4):756-766. PubMed ID: 29099398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disposable Patterned Electroceutical Dressing (PED-10) Is Safe for Treatment of Open Clinical Chronic Wounds.
    Roy S; Prakash S; Mathew-Steiner SS; Das Ghatak P; Lochab V; Jones TH; Mohana Sundaram P; Gordillo GM; Subramaniam VV; Sen CK
    Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2019 Apr; 8(4):149-159. PubMed ID: 31016066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Fabric-Based Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Compared to Standard-of-Care Treatment Against Acute Trauma and Burn Wound Biofilm Infection.
    Chan RK; Nuutila K; Mathew-Steiner SS; Diaz V; Anselmo K; Batchinsky M; Carlsson A; Ghosh N; Sen CK; Roy S
    Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2024 Jan; 13(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 36855334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Modular Adaptive Electrotherapy Delivery System (MAEDS): An Electroceutical Approach for Effective Treatment of Wound Infection and Promotion of Healing.
    Bogie KM
    Mil Med; 2019 Mar; 184(Suppl 1):92-96. PubMed ID: 30395273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing.
    Scully R; Hurlow J; Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
    J Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel murine model for delayed wound healing using a biological wound dressing with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.
    Brandenburg KS; Calderon DF; Kierski PR; Czuprynski CJ; McAnulty JF
    Microb Pathog; 2018 Sep; 122():30-38. PubMed ID: 29842898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electroceutical treatment of infected chronic wounds in a dog and a cat.
    Heald R; Salyer S; Ham K; Wilgus TA; Subramaniam VV; Prakash S
    Vet Surg; 2022 Apr; 51(3):520-527. PubMed ID: 34994470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
    Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
    Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DEVELOPMENT OF A NEXT-GENERATION ANTIMICROBIAL WOUND DRESSING.
    Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler IP
    Acta Med Croatica; 2016 Mar; 70(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 27220190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cohort study on the efficacy of a polyhexanide-containing biocellulose dressing in the treatment of biofilms in wounds.
    Lenselink E; Andriessen A
    J Wound Care; 2011 Nov; 20(11):534, 536-9. PubMed ID: 22240848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12.
    Stuermer EK; Plattfaut I; Dietrich M; Brill F; Kampe A; Wiencke V; Ulatowski A; Geffken M; Rembe JD; Naumova EA; Debus SE; Smeets R
    Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():664030. PubMed ID: 34054768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A surfactant-based wound dressing can reduce bacterial biofilms in a porcine skin explant model.
    Yang Q; Larose C; Della Porta AC; Schultz GS; Gibson DJ
    Int Wound J; 2017 Apr; 14(2):408-413. PubMed ID: 27212453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The wound-healing effects of a next-generation anti-biofilm silver Hydrofiber wound dressing on deep partial-thickness wounds using a porcine model.
    Davis SC; Li J; Gil J; Valdes J; Solis M; Higa A; Bowler P
    Int Wound J; 2018 Oct; 15(5):834-839. PubMed ID: 29893025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrochemical Devices in Cutaneous Wound Healing.
    Evans JP; Sen CK
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 37370642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [IMPACT OF BIOFILM ON HEALING AND A METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING IT IN THE WOUND].
    Skrlin J
    Acta Med Croatica; 2016 Mar; 70(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 27220187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and use of a porcine model with clinically relevant chronic infected wounds.
    Shiff J; Schwartz K; Hausman B; Seshadri DR; Bogie KM
    J Tissue Viability; 2023 Nov; 32(4):527-535. PubMed ID: 37716845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electroceutical Management of Bacterial Biofilms and Surgical Infection.
    Sen CK; Mathew-Steiner SS; Das A; Sundaresan VB; Roy S
    Antioxid Redox Signal; 2020 Oct; 33(10):713-724. PubMed ID: 32466673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical investigation of biofilm in non-healing wounds by high resolution microscopy techniques.
    Hurlow J; Blanz E; Gaddy JA
    J Wound Care; 2016 Sep; 25 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S11-22. PubMed ID: 27608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical safety and effectiveness evaluation of a new antimicrobial wound dressing designed to manage exudate, infection and biofilm.
    Metcalf DG; Parsons D; Bowler PG
    Int Wound J; 2017 Feb; 14(1):203-213. PubMed ID: 27004423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.